Is Our Self Related to Personality? A Neuropsychodynamic Model
Andrea Scalabrini, Clara Mucci, Georg Northoff
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience October 4, 2018 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00346 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Neuroticism Cognitive psychology Psychodynamics Psychology of self Personality disorders Developmental psychology |
| Citations | 58 |
| Key points | Proposes that a multilayered model of the self, with distinct neural correlates for each layer, can characterize different levels of personality organization (psychotic, borderline, neurotic). |
Abstract
The concept and the assessment of personality have been extensively discussed in psychoanalysis and in clinical psychology over the years. Nowadays there is large consensus in considering the constructs of the self and relatedness as central criterions to assess the personality and its disturbances. However, the relation between the psychological organization of personality, the construct of the self, and its neuronal correlates remain unclear. Based on the recent empirical data on the neural correlates of the self (and others), on the importance of early relational and attachment experiences, and on the relation with the brain's spontaneous/resting state activity (rest-self overlap/containment), we propose here a multilayered model of the self with: (i) relational alignment; (ii) self-constitution; (iii) self-manifestation; and (iv) self-expansion. Importantly, these different layers of the self can be characterized by different neuronal correlates-this results in different neuronally grounded configurations or organizations of personality. These layers correspond to different levels of personality organization, such as psychotic (as related to the layer of self-constitution), borderline (as related to the layer of self-manifestation) and neurotic (as related to the layer of self-expansion). Taken together, we provide here for the first time a neurobiologically and clinically grounded model of personality organization, which carries major psychodynamic and neuroscientific implications. The study of the spontaneous activity of the brain, intrinsically related to the self (rest-self overlap/containment) and the interaction with stimuli (rest-stimulus interaction) may represent a further advance in understanding how our default state plays a crucial role in navigating through the internal world and the external reality.
Citations in the library
Cited by 3
- The Mechanisms of Psychedelic Visionary Experiences: Hypotheses from Evolutionary Psychology Frontiers in Neuroscience September 28, 2017
- Temporal integration as “common currency” of brain and self‐scale‐free activity in resting‐stateEEGcorrelates with temporal delay effects on self‐relatedness Human Brain Mapping July 22, 2020
- Flights and Perchings of the BrainMind: A Temporospatial Approach to Psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychology March 24, 2022
Cites 7
- A default mode of brain function Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences January 16, 2001
- Mapping the self in the brain's default mode network Neuroimage February 15, 2016
- Functional Connectivity Measures After Psilocybin Inform a Novel Hypothesis of Early Psychosis Schizophrenia Bulletin October 6, 2012
- How do the brain's time and space mediate consciousness and its different dimensions? Temporo-spatial theory of consciousness (TTC). Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews September 1, 2017
- Is the self a higher-order or fundamental function of the brain? The "basis model of self-specificity" and its encoding by the brain's spontaneous activity. Cognitive Neuroscience 2016
and 2 more in the library