Skip to content

Negative Affect Circuit Subtypes and Neural, Behavioral, and Affective Responses to MDMA: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Xue Zhang, Laura M Hack, Claire Bertrand, Rachel Hilton, Nancy J Gray, Leyla Boyar, Jessica Laudie, Boris D. Heifets, Trisha Suppes, Peter J van Roessel, Carolyn I. Rodríguez, Karl Deisseroth, Brian Knutson, Leanne M Williams

JAMA Network Open April 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.7803 (opens in new tab)

Read Full Text
Relevant Not relevant

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Randomized clinical trial Double-blind Peer reviewed
Sample size 16
Population Adults with subthreshold PTSD symptoms and early life trauma but no current psychiatric disorders, who had used MDMA on at least 2 prior occasions but not in the past 6 months
Intervention MDMA
Dose 120 mg
Topics MDMA
Keywords Psychopharmacology Mental health treatment MDMA Therapy Emotion regulation
Citations 10
Registration NCT04060108
Key findings MDMA, compared with placebo, reduced amygdala and sgACC activity, increased sgACC-amygdala connectivity, and increased liking of threat expressions only in participants with high baseline amygdala reactivity to nonconscious threat.

Abstract

Rapidly acting therapeutics like 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) are promising treatments for disorders such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, understanding who benefits most and the underlying neural mechanisms remains a critical gap. Stratifying individuals by neural circuit profiles could help differentiate neural, behavioral, and affective responses to MDMA, enabling personalized treatment strategies. To investigate whether baseline stratification of individuals based on negative affect circuit profiles, particularly in response to nonconscious threat stimuli, can differentiate acute responses to MDMA. This randomized clinical trial, implementing a double-blinded, within-participant, placebo- and baseline-controlled design, was conducted at Stanford University School of Medicine between November 2, 2021, and November 9, 2022, for wave 1 data collection. Participants had used MDMA on at least 2 prior occasions, but not in the past 6 months, and had subthreshold PTSD symptoms and early life trauma but no current psychiatric disorders. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2023, to January 1, 2024. Participants completed 4 visits: 1 baseline session followed by 1 placebo session and 2 MDMA sessions in a randomized order, totaling 64 visits. Baseline functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) assessed the negative affect circuit using a nonconscious threat processing task (NTN). Primary outcomes included activity and connectivity of amygdala and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) defining the negative affect circuit. Secondary outcomes were behavioral measures of implicit threat bias, likability of threat expressions, and affective assessments. Sixteen participants (10 [63%] female; mean [SD] age, 40.8 [7.6] years) were stratified into subgroups with high and low levels of NTN activity in the amygdala (NTNA+ [n = 8] and NTNA- [n = 8], respectively), based on a median split of baseline nonconscious threat-evoked fMRI responses. Following administration of the 120 mg of MDMA vs placebo, the NTNA+ subgroup showed significant reductions in amygdala (contrast estimate [CE], -1.43; 95% CI, -2.60 to -0.27; Cohen d, -1.22; P = .02) and sgACC activity (CE, -1.48; 95% CI, -2.42 to -0.54; Cohen d, -1.56; P = .004), increased sgACC-amygdala connectivity (CE, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.02-1.28; Cohen d, 1.02; P = .04), and increased likability of threat expressions (CE, 14.38; 95% CI, 1.46-27.29; Cohen d, 0.86; P = .03) compared with the NTNA- subgroup. In this randomized clinical trial of MDMA's acute profiles, 120 mg of MDMA acutely normalized negative affect circuit reactivity in participants stratified by heightened amygdala reactivity at baseline, demonstrating the potential of neuroimaging to identify prospective biomarkers and guide personalized MDMA-based therapies. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04060108.

Comparable studies

Other randomized controlled trials on MDMA, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
MDMA-assisted therapy for severe PTSD: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Patients with severe PTSD, including those with comorbidities such as dissociation,... 2021 Randomized controlled trial n = 90
The safety and efficacy of {+/-}3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted psychotherapy in subjects with chronic, treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder: the first randomized controlled pilot study. Patients with chronic post-traumatic stress disorder refractory to both psychotherapy... 2010 Randomized controlled trial n = 20
3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder in military veterans, firefighters, and police officers: a randomised, double-blind, dose-response, phase 2 clinical trial. Military veterans and first responders aged 18 or older with chronic PTSD lasting 6... 2018 Randomized, double-blind, dose-response, phase 2 clinical trial n = 26
A randomized, controlled pilot study of MDMA (±3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine)-assisted psychotherapy for treatment of resistant, chronic Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Patients with treatment-resistant PTSD 2012 Randomized controlled trial n = 12
MDMA-assisted therapy for moderate to severe PTSD: a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Adults with moderate to severe post-traumatic stress disorder 2023 Randomized controlled trial n = 104

Citations in the library

Cited by 9

and 4 more in the library

Cites 7

and 2 more in the library

Related reading

Explore topics

MDMA PTSD