Did Serendipity Contribute to the Discovery of New Antidepressant Drugs? Historical Analysis Using Operational Criteria.
Francisco López-Muñoz, Pilar D'Ocón, Alejandro Romero, Domenico de Berardis, Cecilio Álamo
Alpha psychiatry April 1, 2025 DOI: 10.31083/AP40037 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Historical analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Antidepressant drugs |
| Keywords | History of medicine Antidepressants/ssris/psychotropics Drug development/pharmaceutical research Psychopharmacology/psychoactive drugs Serendipity/accidental discovery/chance findings |
| Citations | 3 |
| Key points | Classifies antidepressant discoveries into serendipity patterns: most newer antidepressants follow a rational design (type IV), while moclobemide exemplifies type II and ketamine exemplifies type III serendipity. |
Abstract
Given their great importance, as one of the most prescribed types of therapeutic drugs worldwide, we have analyzed the role of serendipity in the discovery of new antidepressants, ranging from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors to more contemporary developments. We carried out a historical analysis of the discovery of new antidepressants, resorting to the original articles published on their development (initial pharmacological and clinical information) and applied an operational criterion of serendipity developed by our group. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, citalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, and escitalopram), selective dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (bupropion), noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake inhibitors (venlafaxine, milnacipram, duloxetine, and desvenlafaxine), selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (reboxetine), noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants (mirtazapine), melatonergic agonists (agomelatine), and serotonin modulators and stimulators (vortioxetine, vilazodone, tianeptine) correspond to the type IV pattern. Moclobemide, a reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor, corresponds to the type II pattern, for which the initial serendipitous findings (i.e., the chance discovery of the inhibitory effects of monoamine oxidase (MAO) whilst being studied for their antihyperlipidemic properties) led to subsequent non-serendipitous discoveries (clinical antidepressant efficacy). Ketamine, a glutamatergic modulator, corresponds to the type III pattern, characterized by a non-serendipitous origin (initial development as an anesthetic agent) leading to a serendipitous observation (the discovery of antidepressant efficacy in individuals illicitly using). The majority of new antidepressants adhere to a type IV pattern, characterized by a rational and targeted design process where serendipity played no part, except moclobemide (type II pattern) and ketamine (type III pattern).
Citations in the library
Cites 8
- NMDAR inhibition-independent antidepressant actions of ketamine metabolites Nature April 24, 2016
- Better Biomarkers, Faster Drugs, Stronger Models: Progress Towards Precision Psychiatry. Missouri medicine 2023
- Taming the Ketamine Tiger Anesthesiology August 6, 2010
- Intravenous Esketamine in Adult Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Double-Blind, Double-Randomization, Placebo-Controlled Study Biological Psychiatry November 4, 2015
- A historical review of antidepressant effects of ketamine and its enantiomers. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior February 5, 2020
and 3 more in the library