Skip to content

Mindfulness-based interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Carolyn C Ee, Ieman Al-Kanini, Mike J Armour, Milan K Piya, Rita McMorrow, Vibhuti S Rao, Dhevaksha Naidoo, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Cynthia M Kroeger, Angelo Sabag

Integrative Medicine Research June 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2025.101138 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review with meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 2,337
Population Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Intervention Mindfulness-based interventions
Duration End of treatment
Topics Meditation
Keywords Integrative medicine Meta-analysis Mindfulness meditation Diabetes management Clinical research Stress reduction
Citations 12
Key findings Mindfulness-based interventions may reduce psychological distress and modestly improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes, but the evidence is too uncertain to support clinical recommendations.

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) can lead to macro- and microvascular complications. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) may improve metabolic and psychological health in individuals with T2DM. We aimed to assess the efficacy of MBIs for management of T2DM. We searched five databases and two trial registries using a comprehensive search strategy developed by a multidisciplinary team including an information scientist. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating MBIs for important clinical outcomes including psychological outcomes, quality of life, glycaemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in adults with T2DM. Where possible, random effects meta-analyses were conducted. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess certainty of the evidence. We included 31 RCTs (2337 participants: 1107 intervention, 1230 control). We found very low certainty evidence that MBIs may reduce stress (standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.01, confidence interval (CI) -1.91 to -0.20, 8 trials, n = 528), depression (SMD -1.26, CI -2.08 to -0.43; 7 trials, n = 570) and anxiety (SMD -0.67, CI -1.27 to -0.08; 4 studies, n = 255) at end of treatment compared to waitlist control/usual care. MBIs may have a small effect on HbA1c and systolic/diastolic blood pressure at end of treatment compared to waitlist control/usual care (HbA1c mean difference (MD) -0.44, 95 % CI -0.71 to -0.17, 9 trials, n = 734; low certainty evidence). There was very low certainty evidence that MBIs + lifestyle may have no effect on HbA1c or body weight compared to lifestyle alone. MBIs may have clinical benefits (particularly psychological) for adults with T2DM, but lack of certainty in the evidence precludes clinical recommendations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014881.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics