Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

The Role and Ethics of Touch and Non-touch in Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy.

Helena Aicher, Anke Röskamp, Marianne Moser, Manuela Brand

Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences November 22, 2025 DOI: 10.1007/7854_2025_608 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Touch has long been central to human communication and healing, but in psychedelic-assisted therapy it raises complex ethical and practical challenges due to patients' heightened vulnerability. Recent reports of boundary violations have sharpened the debate. From a harm reduction perspective, the chapter acknowledges risks and the need for clear boundaries, transparency, informed consent, and cultural sensitivity, while arguing that touch can offer grounding, emotional support, and therapeutic value when used responsibly. Both touch and non-touch interventions are explored, including historical roots and therapeutic potentials, with ethical frameworks outlined to support safe, ethical, and effective practices.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Psychedelic-assisted therapy
Keywords Body-oriented psychotherapy Harm reduction Transgressions Psychedelic touch therapy
Citations 4
Key finding Argues that touch in psychedelic-assisted therapy can offer grounding and emotional support when used with care, but requires clear boundaries, transparency, informed consent, and cultural sensitivity to address risks of misuse and vulnerability.

Abstract

Touch has long been an essential element in human communication and healing. In the field of psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT), the role of touch (and by extension, non-touch) presents complex ethical and practical challenges, particularly due to the heightened vulnerability of individuals in altered states of consciousness. Recent public discourse, including reports of boundary violations and abuse, has sharpened the political and ethical discussion around physical contact in PAT settings.This chapter approaches the topic from a harm reduction perspective, acknowledging the risks of misuse and the need for clear boundaries, transparency, informed consent, and cultural sensitivity. At the same time, we argue that touch can offer grounding, emotional support, and therapeutic value when used with care and responsibly. We explore both touch and non-touch interventions in PAT, examining their historical roots, therapeutic potentials, and outlining the ethical frameworks necessary to navigate this complex and sensitive terrain. Our aim is to contribute to an informed and nuanced dialogue on the topic, which supports safe, ethical, and effective therapeutic practices.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment