Skip to content

Auto-Induction in Oral Esketamine Treatment for Treatment-Resistant Depression: An Exploratory Study.

Jolien K E Veraart, Cornelis F Vos, Nieko C Punt, Dylan Visser, Mireille A Wessels, Sanne Y Smith-Apeldoorn, Jeanine Kamphuis, Robert A Schoevers, Daan J Touw

Pharmaceuticals April 25, 2025 DOI: 10.3390/ph18050627 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cohort Peer reviewed
Sample size 18
Population Patients with treatment-resistant depression receiving oral esketamine
Intervention oral esketamine
Duration Six weeks
Topics Depression Esketamine
Keywords Auto-induction Pharmacokinetics Drug metabolism Antidepressants
Citations 2
Key findings Auto-induction of CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 appears to occur with oral esketamine treatment, potentially contributing to reduced efficacy and side effects over time.

Abstract

Background: Esketamine is a rapidly acting antidepressant with robust efficacy in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Diminishing therapeutic effects and attenuated side effects have been reported after long-term use. This study aimed to investigate its long-term pharmacokinetics and factors that may contribute to reduced efficacy over time in patients with TRD by evaluating the potential role of auto-induction.

Methods: Pharmacokinetic data were collected from 18 patients receiving oral esketamine for six weeks. A pharmacokinetic model was developed to predict esketamine and noresketamine plasma concentrations. Observed esketamine and noresketamine plasma concentrations were compared to model-predicted concentrations to assess deviations suggestive of auto-induction.

Results: On day 39, plasma concentrations of esketamine and noresketamine were 59% and 35% lower than predicted, respectively, indicative of auto-induction of CYP3A4 and CYP2B6.

Conclusions: Auto-induction appears to occur in oral esketamine treatment, which may contribute to reduced therapeutic efficacy and side effects in long-term treatment. Identifying auto-induction as a mechanism of tolerance potentially has important clinical implications. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings and evaluate strategies to maintain therapeutic efficacy.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on esketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Treating bipolar depression with esketamine: Safety and effectiveness data from a naturalistic multicentric study on esketamine in bipolar versus unipolar treatment‐resistant depression Patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression (B-TRD) and unipolar... 2023 Observational cohort n = 70
Comparative Effectiveness of Intravenous Ketamine and Intranasal Esketamine in Clinical Practice Among Patients With Treatment-Refractory Depression: An Observational Study. Adults with treatment-resistant depression 2023 Observational study n = 62
Predicting outcome with Intranasal Esketamine treatment: A machine-learning, three-month study in Treatment-Resistant Depression (ESK-LEARNING) Treatment-resistant depression patients 2023 Retrospective, multicentric, real-world study n = 149
Esketamine in treatment-resistant depression patients comorbid with substance-use disorder: A viewpoint on its safety and effectiveness in a subsample of patients from the REAL-ESK study Patients with treatment-resistant depression and a substance use disorder 2023 Observational, retrospective, multicentre study n = 26
Rapid infusion of esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: a retrospective chart review Patients with treatment-resistant depression and bipolar depression meeting DSM-IV-TR... 2017 Retrospective observational study n = 27

Citations in the library

Explore topics

By condition and practice