Toxicity and Plant Animacy in Amazonia: Cosmology, Chemosensation and Ecosemiotics
Journal of Ethnobiology December 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1177/02780771241289047 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Comparative ethnographic analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Makushi people of Guyana and Matsigenka people of Peru |
| Keywords | Indigenous knowledge Indigenous perspectives Traditional ecological knowledge Amazonian cultures Indigenous understanding Traditional knowledge Plant animacy Plant consciousness Non-human agency Plant personhood Animism Plant perception Ethnobotany Traditional plant use Plant medicine Indigenous botany Phytology Plant properties Healing Toxicity Nature-culture divide Western epistemology Decolonization Mind-body dualism Anthropocentrism critique Western divisions |
| Citations | 8 |
| Key findings | Indigenous Amazonian perspectives on plant animacy are expressed through chemosensory and ecosemiotic processes that challenge Cartesian dualisms, suggesting deeper engagement between anthropology and natural sciences. |
Abstract
In Indigenous Amazonian life-worlds, plants used for diverse purposes such as protecting, harming, seducing and curing are sometimes considered to be ‘plant persons’, imbued with special kinds of subjectivity. In examining plant animism in Amazonia, we consider case studies of the knowledge and use of toxic, medicinal and charm plants from two distinctive societies – the Makushi people of Guyana (Daly) and the Matsigenka of Peru (Shepard). We have focused on the chemosensory modes of communication (taste, odour, texture, etc.) that shape Makushi and Matsigenka interactions with plants, with a particular emphasis on bitterness, causticity and other toxic properties that often embody a plant's power to heal or harm. Here, we delve deeper into Makushi understandings and uses of shamanic plants within the category of bina ‘charms’, exploring how their animacy is entangled with chemosensory properties, phytochemical components and modes of preparation and administration. We also revisit Matsigenka knowledge, concepts and uses of various bamboo species, revealing a complex interpenetration between tactile and chemical perceptions, phenological cycles and eco-cosmological elaborations. Using these cross-cultural examples, we show plant animacy can be expressed through sensorial and ecosemiotic processes of embodiment and ensoulment which defy Cartesian mind/body, nature/culture and subject/object dualisms. In order to fully comprehend plants, we suggest a deeper engagement between anthropology and the natural sciences. Indigenous perspectives on plant animacy raise far-reaching questions about the meanings of body, soul and non-human agency in Indigenous Amazonia, contributing to the relevance of anthropology and ethnobiology in the critical context of the Anthropocene.