Skip to content

Findings From the International Lucid Dream Induction Study.

Denholm J Adventure-Heart

Frontiers in Psychology 2020 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01746 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 355
Population Participants with an interest in lucid dreaming
Interventions Reality testing Wake Back to Bed Mnemonic Induction of Lucid Dreams Senses Initiated Lucid Dream
Duration 1 week baseline, 1 week intervention
Topics Dreaming Lucid dreaming
Keywords Reality test Sleep quality
Citations 16
Key findings MILD and SSILD techniques were similarly effective for inducing lucid dreams, with no added benefit from a hybrid technique.

Abstract

The International Lucid Dream Induction Study (ILDIS) investigated and compared the effectiveness of five different combinations of lucid dream induction techniques including reality testing (RT), Wake Back to Bed (WBTB), the Mnemonic Induction of Lucid Dreams (MILD) technique, the Senses Initiated Lucid Dream (SSILD) technique, and a hybrid technique combining elements of both MILD and SSILD. Participants with an interest in lucid dreaming (N = 355) completed a pre-test questionnaire and then a baseline sleep and dream recall logbook for 1 week before practicing the lucid dream induction techniques for another week. Results indicated that the MILD technique and the SSILD technique were similarly effective for inducing lucid dreams. The hybrid technique showed no advantage over MILD or SSILD. Predictors of successful lucid dream induction included superior general dream recall and the ability to fall asleep within 10 min of completing the lucid dream induction techniques. Successful lucid dream induction had no adverse effect on sleep quality. Findings indicated that the techniques were effective regardless of baseline lucid dreaming frequency or prior experience with lucid dreaming techniques. Recommendations for further research on lucid dream induction techniques are provided.

Comparable studies

Other randomized controlled trials on lucid dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Lucid Dreaming Treatment for Nightmares: A Pilot Study Chronic nightmare sufferers 2006 Randomized controlled trial n = 23
Testing the involvement of the prefrontal cortex in lucid dreaming: A tDCS study Participants spending three consecutive nights in a sleep laboratory 2013 Randomized controlled trial n = 19
Effectiveness of motor practice in lucid dreams: a comparison with physical and mental practice Adults who completed an online experiment 2015 Randomized controlled trial n = 68
Pre-sleep treatment with galantamine stimulates lucid dreaming: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study Adults with high dream recall and an interest in lucid dreaming 2018 Randomized crossover trial n = 121
Studies with lucid dreaming as add-on therapy to Gestalt therapy Adults with nightmares (ICD-10: F51.5) at least twice a week 2015 Randomized controlled trial n = 32

Citations in the library

Explore topics