Skip to content

Which type and dosage of mindfulness-based interventions are most effective for chronic pain? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Mengting Zhu, Samuel Yeung Shan Wong, Claire Chenwen Zhong, Yu Zeng, Luyao Xie, Eric Kam-Pui Lee, Vincent Chi-Ho Chung, Regina Wing-Shan Sit

Journal of Psychosomatic Research April 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112061 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and network meta-analysis Peer reviewed
Sample size 5,339
Population Adults with chronic pain
Interventions Mindfulness-based stress reduction Mindfulness-oriented recovery enhancement Mindfulness-based interventions
Duration 8-week course, once per week, sessions lasting 90 to 120 minutes
Topics Meditation
Keywords Chronic pain Network meta-analysis
Citations 13
Key findings Mindfulness-based stress reduction was most effective for pain intensity and depression, while mindfulness-oriented recovery enhancement was most effective for physical function, with an 8-week, once-weekly, 90-120 minute session being the optimal dosage.

Abstract

Chronic pain exerts an enormous personal and economic burden worldwide. While clinical trials have confirmed the benefits of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) in chronic pain management, knowledge on the best type and dosage remains unknown. This study aims to compare the clinical effectiveness of different MBIs on chronic pain and to identify the optimal dosage of MBIs. The primary outcome was pain intensity and secondary outcomes were physical function and depression. We applied a random-effect pairwise meta-analysis to synthesize data, and network meta-analysis to compare effectiveness among different types and dosages of MBIs. The findings were further categorized according to the partially contextualized framework. A total of 68 studies with 5,339 participants were included. Mindfulness-based stress reduction demonstrated the most promising results for improving pain intensity (SMD -0.76, 95 % CI -1.06 to -0.46, Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Area (SUCRA) 0.75) and depression (SMD -0.77, 95 % CI -0.98 to -0.56, SUCRA 0.86), supported by moderate and high certainty of evidence, respectively. On the other hand, mindfulness-oriented recovery enhancement emerged as the most effective for enhancing physical function (SMD -1.42, 95 % CI -2.28 to -0.57, SUCRA 0.96), albeit with low certainty of evidence. An 8-week course, conducted once per week, with sessions lasting between 90 and 120 min, appeared to be the optimal dosage for addressing pain intensity, physical function, and depression. Our findings contribute to the evidence supporting the use of MBIs in chronic pain management and informing the development of evidence-based guidelines and standardizing the course structures of MBIs. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021293938.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 5

Cites 15

and 10 more in the library

Explore topics