Skip to content

Comparison of cognitive behavioral therapy and third-wave-mindfulness-based therapies for patients suffering from depression measured using the Beck-Depression-Inventory (BDI): A systematic literature review and network-meta-analysis.

Alexander Buschner, Christian Makiol, Jue Huang, Nicole Mauche, Maria Strauß

Journal of Affective Disorders June 15, 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.02.104 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Network meta-analysis Peer reviewed
Population Adults with depression
Interventions Mindfulness-based therapies Cognitive-behavioral therapy
Topics Depression Meditation
Keywords Cognitive behavioral therapy Meta-analysis Mindfulness-based-cognitive-therapy Systematic literature review Third-wave therapies
Citations 5
Key findings Mindfulness-based therapies and cognitive-behavioral therapy both significantly reduce depression symptoms, but mindfulness-based therapies do not show a clinically meaningful advantage over CBT.

Abstract

Mindfulness-based therapies (MBT) are proposed as a "third wave" of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). This network meta-analysis investigated this hypothesis by comparing the effectiveness of MBT and CBT for treating depression, measured by the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). An indirect comparison was made. Relevant databases were searched for studies comparing either CBT or MBT with treatment as usual (TAU). Mean differences (MD) between intervention and TAU were calculated using changes from baseline from both intervention (Me) and TAU-group (Mc). MDs of CBT and MBT were compared in a network meta-analysis. Results were reported for both the common-effects-model (CEM) and the random-effects-model (REM). Risk of Bias (RoB) was measured using the RoB-2-tool. Quality of evidence was investigated based on GRADE. Eight MBT and ten CBT studies, meeting eligibility since 2006, were included. MBT studies included behavioral activation with mindfulness, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, person-based cognitive therapy, and a newly developed meditation-based lifestyle modification program. Both CBT and MBT differed significantly from TAU. In the unweighted CEM network meta-analysis, MBT showed significantly better treatment effect, but this was below the clinically relevant threshold (MD:-1.81). For REM and weighted analysis, there were no significant differences between CBT and MBT. Heterogeneity, high RoB, and low evidence quality were notable, with indirectness limiting this analysis. CBT and MBT both showed significant and clinically important treatment effects for depression. However, an outstanding benefit of MBT in comparison to CBT could not be found in this analysis. Further research could include a direct comparison.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Ketamine and Other NMDA Antagonists: Early Clinical Trials and Possible Mechanisms in Depression Participants with major depression in placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized... 2015 Systematic review and meta-analysis
Side-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review. Patients with depression 2018 Systematic review
Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 1,877
Single-dose infusion ketamine and non-ketamine N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists for unipolar and bipolar depression: a meta-analysis of efficacy, safety and time trajectories Patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar depression 2016 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 588
Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... 2020 Systematic review n = 188

Citations in the library

Explore topics