Skip to content

Efficacy and safety of eight enhanced therapies for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs.

Qinghua Guo, Libo Guo, Yong Wang, Shaomei Shang

Psychiatry Research September 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116018 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Network meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 12,105
Population Adults with treatment-resistant depression
Interventions ECT Ketamine Esketamine Psilocybin Brexpiprazole Quetiapine
Topics Depression
Keywords Enhanced innovative therapies Network meta-analysis Treatment-resistant depression trd Refractory depression Psilocybin treatment Alternative depression treatments Drug trials
Citations 19
Key findings ECT, ketamine, esketamine, and psilocybin are superior first-line treatments for TRD due to optimal balance of effectiveness and tolerability, while brexpiprazole and quetiapine showed no significant efficacy over placebo.

Abstract

Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) challenges psychiatric treatment, with existing guidelines covering only a subset of augmentation strategies. A network meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines examined the efficacy and safety of TRD treatments, analyzing 72 randomized controlled trials from eight databases, assessing response and remission rates, tolerability, and safety through the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and CINeMA framework. Including 12,105 participants, the analysis highlighted ECT, Ketamine, Esketamine, and Psilocybin as superior first-line treatments due to their optimal balance between effectiveness and tolerability. Brexpiprazole and Quetiapine showed no significant efficacy over placebo in response rates, while Esketamine and Psilocybin exhibited lower tolerability. The results advocate for ECT, Ketamine, Esketamine, and Psilocybin as preferred treatments for TRD, guiding clinical practice with evidence-based recommendations for enhancing treatment outcomes. This study underscores the importance of considering both efficacy and safety in selecting augmentation strategies for TRD.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Ketamine and Other NMDA Antagonists: Early Clinical Trials and Possible Mechanisms in Depression Participants with major depression in placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized... 2015 Systematic review and meta-analysis
Side-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review. Patients with depression 2018 Systematic review
Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 1,877
Single-dose infusion ketamine and non-ketamine N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists for unipolar and bipolar depression: a meta-analysis of efficacy, safety and time trajectories Patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar depression 2016 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 588
Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... 2020 Systematic review n = 188

Citations in the library

Cited by 9

and 4 more in the library

Cites 12

and 7 more in the library

Explore topics