Psychoanalysis and psychedelics: The censored story in Argentina.
Rodolfo Olivieri, Luís Fernando Tófoli
The International journal on drug policy November 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104596 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Historical analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Intervention | Psychedelic substances |
| Topics | LSD Psychedelic-assisted therapy |
| Keywords | 20th century Argentina Psychedelic drugs Psychoanalytic therapy Drug research Psychoanalysis History of psychiatry Argentine medicine |
| Citations | 1 |
| Key points | Argues that mid-20th century Argentine psychoanalysts conducted pioneering research combining psychedelics with psychoanalysis, but resistance from the Argentine Psychoanalytic Association led to the cessation of this work. |
Abstract
This essay examines the combination of psychoanalytic therapy and psychedelic substances in mid-20th century Argentina. Through document analysis, it examines the intersection of psychedelics and psychoanalysis, drawing from historical texts and writings by local psychoanalysts to develop a comprehensive understanding of the distinctive clinical practices and therapeutic approaches in the Argentine context. It details the experimental use of these substances, the clinical practices developed, and the professional and societal challenges encountered. Notably, psychoanalysts Luisa de Álvarez de Toledo, Alberto Tallaferro, and Alberto Fontana conducted pioneering research, exploring the therapeutic potential of these substances and publishing their findings in academic papers and books. According to these psychoanalysts, the use of psychedelic drugs in therapy could enhance transference, catalyze catharsis, and circumvent unconscious defenses, allowing for a vivid exploration of the patient's psyche that necessitated interpretation. Despite the innovative nature of this work, resistance from within the Argentine Psychoanalytic Association led to the eventual cessation of psychedelic research in this country. The essay calls for a reconsideration of the psychoanalytic community's relationship with psychedelics, emphasizing the potential for renewed dialogue and incorporation of these substances in contemporary therapeutic practices. In conclusion, this article sheds light on an overlooked chapter of psychoanalysis in a local setting and serves as a call for future explorations in broader scenarios. The resurgence of interest in psychedelics for mental health treatment presents an opportunity for psychoanalysts to engage with emerging research, enriching both theory and practice.