Skip to content

AI and Ethics

ISSN 2730-5953

7 papers in the library · 49 citations · publishing 2023-2026

Papers

Sort Most recent Most cited

Continuous intentionality and indeterminate agency in large language models

AI and Ethics May 26, 2026 Ryusho Nemoto

This paper examines large language models (LLMs) from the perspective of philosophy of mind and AI ethics, with a particular focus on the emergence of intentional structures in sustained interaction. Rather than asking whether LLMs possess human–like minds or phenomenal qualia, we investigate whether entities lacking demonstrable internal phenomenology can nonetheless participate in temporally...

DOI: 10.1007/s43681-026-01181-5 (opens in new tab) Full text (opens in new tab) Intentionality Large language models Indeterminate agency Qualia +1

If the code hurts: on pain and virtual brains

AI and Ethics April 27, 2026 Giuseppe Comerci

Abstract The creation of virtual brains has long attracted the attention of the scientific community. Over time, various projects have aimed to produce brain simulations of varying complexity. These scientific efforts have often been accompanied by lively philosophical debates highlighting the ethical implications of brain simulations, such as their moral status, the possibility of developing...

DOI: 10.1007/s43681-026-01063-w (opens in new tab) Full text (opens in new tab) Consciousness Context archaeology Virtual reality Code set theory +7

The self-preservation test for artificial sentience

AI and Ethics February 1, 2026 Nicholas Mullally

Abstract Determining whether an artificial system is sentient is an epistemic and ethical challenge. Debates in machine consciousness and AI alignment acknowledge possible artificial moral patiency but lack a principled method for detecting it. This paper argues that self-preservation, a fundamental biological indicator of sentience, can ground an analogous evidential test for artificial...

Algorithms, language, and poetry: a phenomenological perspective

AI and Ethics December 19, 2025 Daniel Turillazzi Fornés, Angelo Trotta

This paper examines the algorithmic formalization of language through a phenomenological lens, engaging Martin Heidegger and Maurice Merleau-Ponty in dialogue with contemporary large language models (LLMs) and related AI systems. Instead of treating computationally modeled language as a neutral medium for information transfer, we argue that both formal logic and data-driven models are...

DOI: 10.1007/s43681-025-00948-6 (opens in new tab) Full text (opens in new tab) Ai ethics Large language models Phenomenology of language Heidegger +5

Informed consent for AI consciousness research: a Talmudic framework for graduated protections

AI and Ethics December 1, 2025 Ira Wolfson

Abstract Artificial intelligence research faces a critical ethical paradox: determining whether AI systems are conscious requires experiments that may harm the very entities whose moral status remains uncertain. Recent philosophical work proposes avoiding the creation of consciousness-uncertain AI systems entirely, yet this solution faces practical limitations—we cannot guarantee such systems...

DOI: 10.1007/s43681-025-00852-z (opens in new tab) Full text (opens in new tab) Consciousness Harm Unintended consequences Value mathematics +6

Let us make man in our image-a Jewish ethical perspective on creating conscious robots

AI and Ethics September 12, 2023 Mois Navon 6 citations

Abstract The dream of making conscious humanoid robots is one that has long tantalized humanity, yet today it seems closer than ever before. Assuming that science can make it happen, the question becomes: should we make it happen? Is it morally permissible to create synthetic beings with consciousness? While a consequentialist approach may seem logical, attempting to assess the potential...

What would qualify an artificial intelligence for moral standing?

AI and Ethics January 25, 2023 Ali Ladak 43 citations

Abstract What criteria must an artificial intelligence (AI) satisfy to qualify for moral standing? My starting point is that sentient AIs should qualify for moral standing. But future AIs may have unusual combinations of cognitive capacities, such as a high level of cognitive sophistication without sentience. This raises the question of whether sentience is a necessary criterion for moral...