Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Phys Life Rev

ISSN 1571-0645; 1873-1457;

6 papers in the library · 2 citations · publishing 2013-2025

Papers

The neural correlates of consciousness studies and the mystery of the human mind-a commentary on "Beyond task response - Pre-stimulus activity modulates contents of consciousness" by G. Northoff, F. Zilio & J. Zhang.

Phys Life Rev August 3, 2024

This commentary discusses the challenge of linking neural correlates of consciousness to the subjective experience of the human mind, responding to a target article on how pre-stimulus brain activity shapes conscious content. The author argues that while identifying brain processes that correlate with consciousness is important, it does not fully explain the qualitative, first-person nature of mental experience. The commentary emphasizes the need to integrate neuroscientific findings with philosophical questions about the mind-body problem and suggests that understanding consciousness requires both empirical and conceptual approaches.

Have underground radiation measurements refuted the Orch OR theory?: Comment on "At the crossroad of the search for spontaneous radiation and the Orch OR consciousness theory".

Phys Life Rev February 2, 2023

A commentary argues that underground radiation measurements do not refute the Orch OR consciousness theory, contrary to claims made in a previous article. The author critiques the interpretation of experimental data, suggesting that the search for spontaneous radiation and the Orch OR theory remain at a crossroad rather than being resolved. The commentary emphasizes that the evidence presented does not definitively disprove the Orch OR model, leaving the debate open.

The revised Penrose-Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not scientifically justified: comment on "Consciousness in the universe: a review of the 'Orch OR' theory" by Hameroff and Penrose.

Phys Life Rev November 8, 2013

The commentary argues that the revised orchestrated objective reduction (Orch OR) theory of consciousness, as proposed by Hameroff and Penrose, lacks scientific justification. It critiques the theoretical and empirical foundations of the model, asserting that the mechanisms invoked—quantum processes in microtubules—are not supported by current neuroscience or physics. The author concludes that the Orch OR hypothesis does not provide a viable explanation for human consciousness.