Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

S. van Gaal

3 papers in the library · 119 citations · publishing 2020-2022

Papers

An academic survey on theoretical foundations, common assumptions and the current state of consciousness science

Neuroscience of Consciousness January 1, 2022 Jolien C. Francken, L. Beerendonk, D. Molenaar et al. 96 citations

A survey of 166 consciousness researchers reveals ongoing debate about the definition and study of consciousness. Most respondents believe machines could have consciousness, that consciousness is gradual across the animal kingdom, and that unconscious processing is extensive, covering both low-level and high-level cognitive functions. The survey identifies which theories of consciousness are considered most promising and how different theories cluster, which dependent measures best index consciousness, and which neural measures are thought to be its most likely signatures. These findings offer a snapshot of current views to help prioritize research and theoretical approaches.

An academic survey on theoretical foundations, common assumptions and the current state of the field of consciousness science

June 14, 2021 Jolien C. Francken, L. Beerendonk, D. Molenaar et al. 23 citations preprint

A survey of 232 active consciousness scientists reveals ongoing debate about the definition of consciousness and how to study it. Most respondents believe machines could have consciousness, that consciousness is gradual across the animal kingdom, and that unconscious processing is extensive, covering both low- and high-level cognition. The results identify which theories of consciousness are considered most promising, how different theories cluster, which behavioral measures best index consciousness, and which neural measures are most likely signatures of consciousness. These findings offer a snapshot of dominant views among professionals, potentially helping to prioritize research and theoretical approaches.

Subjective visibility report is facilitated by conscious predictions only

bioRxiv July 9, 2020 Josipa Alilovic, H. Slagter, S. van Gaal preprint

Valid predictions improve conscious perception of a second target in an attentional blink task, but only when the predictive first target is consciously seen. Unseen first targets do not produce this benefit, regardless of the time interval between targets. The findings clarify how predictive processing and conscious access interact.