Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
January 1, 2017
Samuel T. Wilkinson, Dashaun Wright, Madonna K. Fasula et al.
120 citations
Ketamine provides rapid but short-lived antidepressant effects. In an open-label trial, patients with treatment-resistant depression received a 2-week course of intravenous ketamine alongside a 10-week course of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Of 16 participants, 8 responded to ketamine and 7 achieved remission in the first 2 weeks. Among responders, 25% relapsed by the end of CBT, and the median time to relapse was 12 weeks after ketamine. Among remitters, 2 of 7 maintained remission through 8 weeks after ketamine. Ketamine nonresponders did not benefit from CBT. The combination may help sustain ketamine's effects, but randomized controlled trials are needed.
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
July 23, 2018
Samuel T. Wilkinson, Rachel B. Katz, Mesut Toprak et al.
88 citations
In a clinical setting, ketamine infusions for severe, treatment-resistant mood disorders showed lower response and remission rates than those in research protocols. Of 44 patients starting a four-infusion protocol, 45.5% responded and 27.3% remitted by the fourth infusion. A small long-term subsample (n=14) received 12 to 45 total treatments over 14 to 126 weeks with no observed cognitive decline, increased delusions, or cystitis symptoms. The treatment was generally well tolerated, but the small maintenance group limits conclusions about long-term safety.
JAMA Psychiatry
May 11, 2022
Sina Nikayin, Taeho Greg Rhee, Maria Elena Cunningham et al.
43 citations
In a clinical setting, patients treated with intravenous ketamine or intranasal esketamine showed similar trajectories of depression severity over time, suggesting both treatments are comparably effective for depression.
JAMA Network Open
June 3, 2024
Manish Kumar Jha, Samuel T. Wilkinson, Kamini Krishnan et al.
29 citations
In people with treatment-resistant depression who do not have psychosis, intravenous ketamine works as well as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) overall. Among outpatients with moderately severe or severe depression, ketamine produced greater improvement in depressive symptoms than ECT. In contrast, inpatients with very severe depression improved more with ECT early in treatment, though by the end of the three-week course both treatments were similarly effective. Higher premorbid intelligence and a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder were linked to greater improvement with ECT, but not with ketamine. These findings may help patients and clinicians decide between the two treatments.
General Hospital Psychiatry
January 1, 2024
Mina Ansari, Brian Pittman, Daniel S Tylee et al.
6 citations
Blood pressure increases during ketamine infusion for depression, peaking at 40 minutes with average rises of 16.0 mmHg systolic and 11.0 mmHg diastolic. Severe hypertension occurred in 12.5% of patients and 0.98% of infusion sessions, most often during the first three treatments. Older age and a history of hypertension were associated with larger blood pressure surges, indicating that careful cardiovascular monitoring is needed, especially for these patients.
Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)
April 1, 2025
Sophie I Elliott, Rachel B. Katz, Robert Ostroff et al.
2 citations
For severe treatment-resistant depression, both electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and ketamine are effective, but it remains unclear which is superior. Two noninferiority trials and three meta-analyses show efficacy for both treatments yet report contradictory findings about which works better. Discrepancies may stem from differences in patient selection, outcome measures, treatment delivery, and site experience. Each treatment has unique risks and benefits that should be weighed for individual patients. The authors aim to help clinicians choose the optimal treatment by evaluating the latest evidence and patient-specific factors.
Contemp Clin Trials
March 2, 2026
Samuel T. Wilkinson, Sandhya Prashad, Rachel Dalthorp et al.
1 citation
The EQUIVALENCE trial protocol describes a non-inferiority, comparative effectiveness study designed to test whether intranasal esketamine is no less effective than intravenous ketamine for treating treatment-resistant depression. The study will compare the two treatments head-to-head in patients who have not responded to prior antidepressant therapies. The protocol outlines the trial's design, including randomization, dosing regimens, outcome measures, and statistical analysis plan. By directly comparing these two forms of ketamine, the trial aims to provide evidence on whether the more convenient intranasal route can match the efficacy of the intravenous formulation, potentially offering a more accessible treatment option.