Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Richard S. Ascough

2 papers in the library · 9 citations · publishing 2025-2026

Papers

Psychedelics, Eleusis, and the Invention of Religious Experience.

Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.) March 1, 2026 Sharday Mosurinjohn, Richard S. Ascough 5 citations

A scholarly critique argues that the popular claim that the ancient Eleusinian Mysteries involved psychedelic drugs is based on flawed methodology and rhetorical tricks rather than solid evidence. The authors trace how Carl Ruck, Brian Muraresku, and influencers like Joe Rogan built a pseudo-history by presenting speculation as fact, then using that as a foundation for further conjecture. This effort to give Western civilization a psychedelic pedigree, the critique contends, resembles religious fundamentalism—treating a modern practice as the hidden true religion underlying all traditions. The fixation on a supposed Eleusinian drug ignores well-documented Indigenous psychedelic histories and nonpharmacological methods of altering consciousness. The authors conclude that this shaky historical foundation undermines arguments for modern psychedelic use and that honest scholarship, not mythmaking, is essential for progress in decriminalization and regulation.

John Allegro and the Psychedelic Mysteries Hypothesis

Religions August 9, 2025 Richard S. Ascough 4 citations

John Allegro's thesis that early Christianity originated from fertility cults centered on psychedelic mushroom use was widely rejected by scholars upon publication due to flawed linguistic methods, yet it persists in popular culture and entheogenic discourse. This article evaluates the scholarly reception, methodological shortcomings, and lasting cultural impact of Allegro's work, particularly within the psychedelic mysteries hypothesis. While some scholars attempt to salvage his intuitive insights, the article concludes that Allegro's foundational methodological errors make his work a historical curiosity rather than a reliable source for contemporary entheogenic scholarship.