Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Shinnyi Chou

2 papers in the library · publishing 2025-2026

Papers

Envisioning Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Biased Signaling as a Therapeutic Target for Schizophrenia.

The American journal of psychiatry April 17, 2026 Shih-Hsuan Ku, Sierra J Stringfield, Mary M Torregrossa et al.

Cannabis use is more common among people with schizophrenia than the general population, partly due to shared genetic risk. Beyond overlapping risks, cannabis pharmacologically worsens an already altered cortical system. Cannabis use dose-dependently increases the likelihood of a schizophrenia diagnosis, acutely worsens symptoms, and leads to poorer long-term outcomes. The psychoactive component, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, acts on the cannabinoid CB1 receptor (CB1R), a G protein-coupled receptor. This review examines recent advances in understanding CB1R biology, sex differences, alterations in schizophrenia, and the impact of comorbid cannabis use. Cell type-specific findings reconcile past discrepancies, and new knowledge of GPCR pharmacology and biased ligands offers opportunities for CB1R-targeted therapeutics for schizophrenia, especially with comorbid cannabis use.

The effects of cannabinoid agonism on auditory discrimination.

Behavioural Pharmacology April 1, 2025 Danielle Nykanen, Hannah Stiffler, Merrick Bay et al.

Cannabinoid agonism via WIN 55,212-2 did not impair auditory discrimination in rats. Twenty-two rats were trained to press a lever for sucrose in response to either a pure tone or white noise, with correct responses reinforced and incorrect ones punished. After reaching criterion, they received 1.2 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, or saline. On day 3, active lever-pressing was higher in both dose groups compared to saline, but overall pressing decreased over time in the high-dose group. No effects on discrimination or errors were observed, indicating that cannabinoid agonism did not negatively affect auditory discrimination, contrary to some previous findings.