Skip to content

Mapping psilocybin therapy: A systematic review of therapeutic frameworks, adaptations, and standardization across contemporary clinical trials

Mary E. Kittur, Mingyao Liu, Brett D. M. Jones, Daniel M. Blumberger, Benoit H. Mulsant, Joshua D. Rosenblat, Muhammad Ishrat Husain

Journal of Affective Disorders July 18, 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119952 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Peer reviewed
Sample size 22
Population Participants in 22 recent clinical trials of psilocybin for mental health conditions including major depression, treatment-resistant depression, medical condition-related distress, substance use disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and eating disorders
Topics Psilocybin
Keywords Standardization Clinical trial Systematic review Medline Psychotherapist
Citations 12
Key findings Trials of psilocybin therapy show broad consistency in therapeutic structure but vary in intensity, diagnostic adaptations, and use of evidence-based psychotherapies, with fewer than half reporting standardization measures.

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that psilocybin can produce rapid and sustained clinical benefits when administered in conjunction with psychological support. Though non-pharmacological procedures are considered integral, the field lacks therapeutic guidelines and little is known about current practices. This systematic review sought to provide a comprehensive and cross-diagnostic synthesis of current psilocybin therapy (PT) protocols across contemporary mental health related trials. Primary objectives were to define and compare PT models with respect to overall therapeutic framework, evidence-based psychotherapeutic adaptations, and therapeutic standardization measures. Database search identified 22 recent trials assessing psilocybin as treatment for major and treatment-resistant depression, medical condition-related distress, substance use, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and eating disorders. Cross-diagnostic review revealed broad consistency in therapeutic structure (i.e. before, during, and after psilocybin treatment), session themes, and external context during drug administration. However, trials varied in therapeutic intensity, diagnostic adaptations, and incorporation of evidence-based psychotherapies. Less than half of reviewed trials reported standardization measures such as manualized procedures, PT-specific training, or adherence and fidelity monitoring. With non-pharmacological treatment mechanisms still unclear, results highlight potential confounds and standardization gaps that undermine the replicability and generalizability of recent psilocybin interventions. Until adjunctive support protocols are adequately operationalized, mechanistic insight and uptake into clinical practice will remain a challenge.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psilocybin, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... 2020 Systematic review n = 188
Blinding and expectancy confounds in psychedelic randomized controlled trials 2021 Systematic review
Antidepressive, anxiolytic, and antiaddictive effects of ayahuasca, psilocybin and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD): a systematic review of clinical trials published in the last 25 years Patients from included clinical trials 2016 Systematic review
The experimental effects of psilocybin on symptoms of anxiety and depression: A meta-analysis People with elevated symptoms of anxiety and depression 2020 Meta-analysis n = 117
Default Mode Network Modulation by Psychedelics: A Systematic Review Participants from included studies 2022 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 15

and 10 more in the library

Cites 57

and 52 more in the library

Explore topics