Skip to content

Ketamine for co-occurring chronic pain and depression: A scoping review highlighting the dual-outcome evidence gap and its treatment and research implications.

Simon Asnes, Julio C Nunes, Rebecca Suh, Gabriel P. A. Costa, Katherine Jones, Melissa C Funaro, Samuel T. Wilkinson, John H. Krystal, Joao P De Aquino

Journal of Pain November 9, 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2026.106491 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Scoping review Randomized Peer reviewed
Intervention Ketamine
Topics Depression Ketamine Esketamine
Keywords Analgesia Nmda receptor antagonist Pain
Key findings Across 12 studies, most reported concurrent improvement in pain and depressive symptoms after ketamine, but heterogeneity in population definitions, dosing, study design, and psychiatric comorbidity precludes concluding that depression modifies ketamine's analgesic effect. The authors argue that prospective randomized studies with standardized chronic pain and depression measures are needed.

Abstract

Chronic pain and depression frequently co-occur, share clinical features, and involve shared neurobiological substrates. Ketamine, an NMDA-receptor antagonist, has established antidepressant efficacy, whereas its analgesic efficacy for chronic pain remains uncertain. Given the overlap between chronic pain and depression, ketamine may serve as a potential dual-action treatment. We conducted a scoping review of studies in which pain and depressive outcomes were both assessed longitudinally after ketamine treatment. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus through August 2026. Experimental and observational studies reporting post-treatment pain and depression outcomes were included; acute, perioperative, perinatal, and cancer-related pain were excluded. Of 2187 records screened, 12 studies met inclusion criteria (2007-2025). Eight enrolled patients with consensus-based chronic pain (≥3 months); among these, only two used clinical diagnoses to characterize depression (one being retrospective chart review), whereas the remainder used symptom scales. Four depression-primary studies enrolled patients with major depressive disorder, treatment-resistant depression, or bipolar depression but did not rigorously establish chronic pain duration. Most studies reported concurrent improvement in pain and depressive symptoms, but heterogeneity in population definitions, ketamine administration regimens, study design, and psychiatric comorbidity precludes inference that depression modifies ketamine's analgesic effect. Prospective randomized studies using standardized chronic pain and depression measures are needed to clarify ketamine's efficacy and real-world applicability. REGISTRATION: This protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) (registration: OSF.IO/3ER5W) PERSPECTIVE: This review maps studies that assessed pain and depressive symptoms longitudinally during ketamine treatment. Concurrent improvement was commonly reported, but inconsistent depression ascertainment, pain phenotyping, dosing, and study design prevent conclusions about depression-specific analgesic effects. Prospective trials with clinically defined comorbidity are needed.

Comparable studies

Other narrative reviews on ketamine for depression, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics

By condition and practice