Mindfulness-based interventions for addressing sexual function after cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lauren A. Zimmaro, Andrew Nicklawsky, Stephen J Lepore, Jennifer B. Reese
Supportive Care in Cancer August 19, 2025 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-025-09812-z (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Systematic review and meta-analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Cancer survivors; most trials (8 of 12) conducted exclusively in women |
| Intervention | Mindfulness-based interventions |
| Measures | Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Humans Neoplasms Sexual dysfunctions, psychological Female Sexual dysfunction, physiological Cancer survivors Meta-analysis Sexual function Systematic review Mindfulness-based interventions |
| Key findings | All 12 included trials reported improvements in at least one domain of sexual function after mindfulness-based interventions, with 9 of 12 reporting positive effects across all domains. Pooled analyses of the Female Sexual Function Index showed significant improvements in total sexual functioning (mean difference 4.74) and in desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. The authors conclude that MBIs hold promise, particularly for women, but that rigorous randomized trials and more diverse populations are needed. |
Abstract
Purpose: Cancer treatment often results in sexual dysfunction, and while mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) could be well-suited to treat these issues, the characteristics and efficacy of MBIs on sexual function in cancer populations have not been fully examined. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to describe and evaluate the efficacy of MBIs for alleviating sexual problems in cancer survivors.
Methods: Databases were searched for experimental and quasi-experimental MBI trials using validated sexual function measures and conducted among cancer survivors. Independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment (JBI-RCT/NR checklists). Study characteristics and effect sizes were synthesized and described; random effects models were used to calculate within-group mean differences and perform meta-analyses as appropriate.
Results: Twelve trials were eligible. Most showed a low/moderate risk of bias (75%, n = 9/12) and were conducted exclusively in women (66%, n = 8/12). All twelve studies reported improvements in at least one domain of sexual function from pre-to-post-MBI, with 75% of trials (n = 9/12) reporting positive effects across all sexual functioning domains. Effect sizes varied across study characteristics. Single-arm trials (50%, n = 6/12) were all conducted on sexual function-specific MBIs and showed the largest effect sizes, whereas RCTs (50%, n = 6/12) were mainly conducted on MBIs without sexual function-specific content and showed less robust effects. Meta-analyses of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) revealed significant and clinically meaningful improvements in women's sexual functioning (FSFI mean difference [95% CI]: total = 4.74 [2.54, 6.93]; desire = 0.68 [0.42, 0.95]; arousal = 0.89 [0.53, 1.25]; lubrication = 0.70 [0.25, 1.16]; orgasm = 0.79 [0.28, 1.31]; satisfaction = 0.70 [0.28, 1.11]; pain = 0.60 [0.29, 0.91]).
Conclusions: MBIs hold promise for improving sexual function after cancer, particularly for women. However, rigorous RCT designs and enhanced diversity within study populations are necessary to address remaining knowledge gaps and substantiate efficacy.
Comparable studies
Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations | 2014 | Meta-analysis | n = 3,515 |
| Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects | 2009 | Systematic review and meta-analysis | |
| The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators | 2012 | Meta-analysis | n = 163 |
| Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission | 2016 | Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials | n = 1,258 |
| Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials | 2011 | Systematic review |
Citations in the library
Cites 17
- What defines mindfulness-based programs? The warp and the weft Psychological Medicine December 29, 2016
- Mindfulness-based interventions: an overall review British Medical Bulletin April 21, 2021
- How long does a mindfulness‐based stress reduction program need to be? A review of class contact hours and effect sizes for psychological distress Journal of Clinical Psychology March 23, 2009
- Mindfulness‐based interventions for psychological and physical health outcomes in cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials Psycho-Oncology September 11, 2019
- Psychological benefits for cancer patients and their partners participating in mindfulness‐based stress reduction (MBSR) Psycho-Oncology November 16, 2009
and 12 more in the library