Religious Landscape in Contemporary Latvia
Solveiga Krūmiņa-Koņkova
The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society May 13, 2026 DOI: 10.18848/2154-8633/cgp/a518 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that Latvia's religious landscape is fragmented and pluralistic, shaped by Soviet-era forced secularization, with traditional Christian churches coexisting alongside alternative spiritual movements, individualized practices, and hybrid spirituality. Contends that institutional religions' cultural authority is declining while "soft spirituality" and esotericism become more normalized in public discourse, wellness culture, and popular culture, and that churches show a dual trajectory of conservatism combined with greater acceptance of experiential and contemplative practices. |
Abstract
This article examines the shifts in Latvia’s religious landscape in the twenty-first century, focusing on the interplay between secularization, post-secularization, and emerging spiritual practices. Here, the religious landscape mainly refers to the spatial, social, and symbolic organization of faith within society, highlighting how secular and religious elements continue to coexist and shape public life in contemporary Latvia. The article considers how the specific historical context of Latvia, particularly the forced secularization of the Soviet period, has contributed to its fragmented, pluralistic religious landscape, where traditional Christian churches coexist with alternative spiritual movements, individualized spiritual practices, and hybrid forms of spirituality. The article also considers the declining cultural authority of institutional religions, the rise of “soft spirituality,” and the increasingly normalized acceptance of esotericism in public discourse, wellness culture, and popular culture. The article examines the dual trajectory within churches, in which religious conservatism is combined with a greater acceptance of experiential, contemplative, and spiritual practices, such as meditation, retreats, and activism. Finally, the discussion places the transformation of Latvia’s religious landscape within a broader context, highlighting how post-socialist societies reshape collective and individual identities by drawing on various spiritual resources. This process reflects a deeper, dynamic, relational interaction that demonstrates the resilience and adaptability of spirituality in a post-secular space.