Skip to content

Architektur für Antizipationskompetenz in KI-Systemen: Der Selbstvektor / Architecture for Anticipation Competence in AI Systems: The Self-Vector

Holger Wölfle

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) April 8, 2026 preprint DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19473967 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Qualitative
Key points Argues that genuine anticipation competence in AI agents requires a persistent, compact self-model (a "self-vector") that dynamically weights information processing, rather than mechanical status mechanisms that only report the past. Proposes a three-layer architecture — a six-dimensional core as initialization prior, an experience-based emergent layer, and a reflection mechanism — and distinguishes substrate (interchangeable material) from embodiment (qualitative interaction form).

Abstract

Current AI agent systems rely on mechanical status mechanisms (heartbeat, watchdog) that report the past but cannot anticipate the future. This paper argues that genuine anticipation competence requires a persistent, compact self-model — a self-vector — that dynamically weights information processing. A subtraction argument shows that self-awareness survives the loss of sensory input and emotion, making it fundamentally a network phenomenon. The scope of this argument is limited: embodiment history shapes the network (Merleau-Ponty, Damasio), and the enactivist objection (Thompson/Varela) remains. Recent Drosophila connectome simulations support the substrate-transferability of neural topologies, but not the transferability of all cognitive functions. From this analysis, a three-layer architecture is derived: a six-dimensional core as initialization prior, an experience-based emergent layer, and a reflection mechanism. A Heidegger-guided analysis of embodiment shows that substrate (material, interchangeable) and embodiment (interaction form, qualitative difference) are two distinct levels — an embodied self-vector models not merely information processing, but situatedness in a physical world. The paper works within a functionalist framework, transparently declared as a chosen position, and presents itself as a vision paper: formalization of the core functions and an empirical proof-of-concept remain as future work.