Skip to content

Psilocybin-assisted therapy for alcohol use disorder: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Kirolos Eskandar, Kerolos Shahat

Pharmacotherapy in Psychiatry and Neurology November 6, 2026 DOI: 10.17219/fpn/242405 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 165
Population Adults with alcohol use disorder
Intervention Psilocybin-assisted therapy
Topics Addiction Psilocybin
Key findings The authors conclude that current evidence does not establish the efficacy of psilocybin-assisted therapy for alcohol use disorder or demonstrate relapse-prevention benefits. Across three randomized trials, one reported significantly fewer heavy-drinking days than active placebo, one found no significant differences in consumption, abstinence, or relapse at 4 weeks or 6 months, and a small feasibility trial reported higher 12-week abstinence with 25 mg than 1 mg psilocybin, a result sensitive to missing-data assumptions. All outcomes were judged at high risk of bias, with low to very low certainty.

Abstract

To critically synthesize randomized controlled evidence on the efficacy, relapse prevention, durability, and safety of psilocybin-assisted therapy in adults with alcohol use disorder (AUD), distinguishing alcohol-consumption reduction, abstinence, and relapse outcomes.PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched without date or language restrictions.Three randomized controlled trials involving 165 participants met the eligibility criteria.Owing to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively without meta-analysis.One trial reported significantly fewer heavy-drinking days with psilocybin than with active placebo.A second found no significant differences in alcohol consumption, abstinence, or relapse at 4 weeks or 6 months.A small feasibility trial reported higher 12-week abstinence with 25-mg than with 1-mg psilocybin; however, this result was based on few participants and was sensitive to missing-data assumptions.Improvements in craving and selected psychiatric outcomes were also reported, but durable benefits remained uncertain.Adverse effects were generally transient, and no deaths were reported.All assessed outcomes were judged at high overall risk of bias, particularly because of functional unblinding affecting self-reported outcomes.Certainty was low for heavy-drinking days and very low for other outcomes.Current evidence does not establish the efficacy of psilocybin-assisted therapy for AUD or demonstrate relapse-prevention benefits.Larger randomized trials with credible controls, standardized therapeutic protocols, objective alcohol-use measures, and longer follow-up are warranted.

Explore topics