Skip to content

Mindful eating versus prayer before meals for psycho-physiological outcomes in middle-aged women: A randomized controlled trial.

Chun-Chun Lin, Ching-Hui Chen, Kenneth W Holloway, Fen-Fang Chuang, Yueh-Chiao Yeh

Complementary Therapies in Medicine November 4, 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2026.103467 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 87
Population Community-dwelling women aged 40-64 years
Interventions Mindful eating Prayer before meals Routine eating control
Duration 7-day intervention with baseline and day-7 measurements
Measures Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory subscale, blood pressure, body weight, waist circumference
Keywords Complementary medicine Middle-aged women Mindful eating Physiological indicators Prayer before meals State anxiety
Key findings Time-by-group differences appeared for EAT-26 total scores, the Dieting subscale, and body weight, but EAT-26 total and Dieting scores increased in the mindful-eating group, a direction the authors say should not be interpreted as improved eating attitudes. Mindful eating showed a mean body-weight decrease of 0.40 kg, considered exploratory. No significant time-by-group effects were found for blood pressure, waist circumference, or state anxiety.

Abstract

Meal-time contemplative practices may provide simple complementary self-care strategies for women during midlife. This study compared the short-term effects of mindful eating, prayer before meals, and routine eating on eating-attitudes, anxiety, and physiological indicators. In this assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial, 87 community-dwelling women aged 40-64 years were allocated to mindful eating (ME), prayer before meals (PE), or routine eating control (CONT) for 7 days. Completed baseline and day-7 data were available for 86 participants (CONT, n = 29; ME, n = 28; PE, n = 29). Outcomes included the Eating Attitudes Test-26, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory subscale, blood pressure, body weight, and waist circumference. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to examine time, group, and time × group effects. Baseline characteristics showed no statistically significant between-group differences. Significant time × group interventions were observed for EAT-26 total scores (F(2,83) = 5.694, p = .005), the Dieting subscale (F(2,83) = 5.054, p = .008), and body weight (F(2,83) = 3.544, p = .033). However, EAT-26 total and Dieting scores increased in the ME group; because higher EAT-26 scores indicate greater eating-related concerns, these findings should not be interpreted as improved eating attitudes. The mean body-weight decrease in the ME group was 0.40 kg; this secondary finding was considered exploratory. No significant time × group interactions were found for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, waist circumference, or state anxiety. This small, short-duration exploratory RCT identified increase in EAT-26 total and Dieting scores in an unfavorable direction, alongside a small short-term change in measured body weight. The findings do not establish improved eating attitudes, differential effects on blood pressure or state anxiety, or weight-management efficacy. Longer, prospectively registered trial with stronger adherence monitoring and standardized measurements are needed to clarify the clinical significance of these observation.

Citations in the library

Explore topics