Skip to content

Cannabis use and duration of untreated psychosis: a systematic review of clinical predictors and neurobiological correlates

Valerio Ricci, Stefania Chiappini, Giovanni Martinotti, Giuseppe Maina

Frontiers in Psychiatry November 2, 2026 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1986256 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Peer reviewed
Population Patients with first-episode psychosis across 23 observational studies
Topics Cannabis
Key findings The review concludes that the evidence does not support a consistently shorter duration of untreated psychosis among cannabis users. The direction of association depended on how exposure was defined, on age, and on setting: the two largest samples of current or recent use reported a longer untreated period, no study of lifetime use or cannabis use disorder reported a shorter DUP, and both adolescent studies reported longer DUP among users.

Abstract

Background: Duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) is an established prognostic factor in first-episode psychosis, and cannabis use is highly prevalent in these populations, yet whether and in which direction the two are related remains unclear.

Objective: To review the evidence on cannabis use and DUP in first-episode psychosis, with attention to how exposure and outcome have been defined.

Methods: Five databases were searched for observational studies reporting DUP in relation to cannabis use, either directly or alongside other variables. Quality was appraised with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and findings were synthesised narratively.

Results: Twenty-three studies were included, with samples ranging from 33 to 1,266 patients. The direction of the associations varied with the definition of exposure. Among studies assessing current or recent use, one small sample reported a significantly shorter DUP and two pointed in the same direction, whereas the two largest samples reported a longer untreated period and several found no difference. Among studies assessing lifetime use or a cannabis use disorder, none reported a shorter DUP. Both studies examining adolescents reported longer DUP among users, and where cannabis was analysed jointly with social or genetic moderators its association depended on the context of use. Smaller unadjusted samples tended to favour shorter DUP, larger representative ones did not.

Conclusions: The evidence does not support a consistently shorter DUP among cannabis users. The direction of the association appears to depend on how exposure is defined, on age and on setting, and the variability in the operationalisation of DUP further limits comparability.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cannabis, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Effects of cannabis use on outcomes of psychotic disorders: systematic review People with psychotic disorders, as examined in 13 longitudinal studies 2008 Systematic review
The Impact of Cannabis Use on Cognitive Functioning in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Existing Findings and New Data in a First-Episode Sample Patients with established schizophrenia (meta-analysis: 572) and patients with... 2010 Meta-analysis and cross-sectional observational study n = 700
Medicinal cannabis for psychiatric disorders: a clinically-focused systematic review 2020 Systematic review
Neuroimaging in cannabis use: a systematic review of the literature Cannabis users and controls in neuroimaging studies 2009 Systematic review
Human Laboratory Studies on Cannabinoids and Psychosis. Healthy human subjects and individuals with schizophrenia 2016 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics