Muḥammad's call revisited : a critical approach to Muslim tradition
Hyondo. Park
eScholarship@McGill 1996 DOI: 10.82308/20762 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Historical analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that Muslim traditions about Muhammad's call to prophethood are too inconsistent to permit reconstruction of the historical event, and that modern Islamicists such as Tor Andrae and W. M. Watt attempted such reconstructions at the expense of sound source criticism. The traditions instead provide evidence of the complex ways Muslims understood the event, suited to their religio-theological interpretation of Qur'anic allusions to Muhammad's religious experiences. |
Abstract
This thesis is an examination of Muslim traditions concerning Muhammad's call to prophethood. Although Muhammad's initial prophetic call is one of the most crucial events in the history of Islamic religious tradition, Muslim records of the event are too inconsistent to be reconciled. At the expense of sound source criticism, some influential modern Islamicists, like Tor Andrae and W. M. Watt, have tried to reconstruct Muhammad's call from inconsistent hadiths. Drawing on the works of four Muslim traditionists, i.e. Ibn Ishaq, Ibn Sa'd, al-Bukhari and al-Tabari this thesis points out that, other than the fact that Muhammad must have gone through a fundamental religious experience, Muslim traditions do not permit a reconstruction of the historical event of Muhammad's call; they do provide, however, evidence of the complex ways in which Muslims understood the event, suited to their religio-theological interpretation of the Qur'anic allusions to the modes of Muhammad's religious experiences.