Skip to content

Simulated Driving and Attention of Repeat Users of MDMA and THC Compared with THC Users and Non-Drug-Using Controls

Caroline T. J. Lamers, Matthew Rizzo, Antoine Bechara, Jan Ramaekers

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2006 DOI: 10.1177/0361198106196900107 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational comparative study Peer reviewed
Sample size 42
Population Abstinent MDMA and marijuana users, marijuana-only users, and non-drug-using age-matched controls
Topics Cannabis MDMA
Key findings MDMA/THC users entered a simulated collision at 42 mph versus 26 mph for controls, and THC users reduced speed 7 mph less than controls when passing a parked car. Processing speed and attention did not differ between groups, suggesting executive function impairments. Because collision speed did not differ between MDMA/THC and THC users, a specific role of MDMA remains to be established.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to assess if cognitive impairments in abstinent users of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) are due to repeated use of MDMA or concurrent drugs of abuse and how these impairments interfere with key activities of daily life such as automobile driving. Simulated driving performance and attention of 12 users of MDMA and marijuana [tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)] (MDMA/THC), 15 THC users, and 15 non-drug-using, age-matched controls were compared. THC users’ mean speed reduction in response to passing a car parked on the shoulder of the road was 7 mph (11.3 km/h) less than that of controls. Compared with non-drug-using controls, the MDMA/THC users were less able to mitigate the effects of an illegal intersection incursion by another vehicle and entered the collision at a higher speed (42 versus 26 mph). In real life, this 16-mph (26-km/h) difference would increase the likelihood of injuring parties in both colliding vehicles. Processing speed and attention did not differ between groups; this suggests that the lower speed reduction in the MDMA/THC users was more likely due to executive function impairments (incorrect situation interpretation and awareness) than to reduced processing speed. In conclusion, compared with non–drug users, MDMA/THC users may be at a greater risk for driver performance errors that lead to crashes. Because collision speed did not differ between MDMA/THC users and THC users, a specific role of MDMA as opposed to THC toxicity in driving performance impairment remains to be established.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on cannabis, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
High-potency cannabis and the risk of psychosis People with first episode of psychosis and healthy controls from the local population 2009 Case-control study n = 454
Ayahuasca-Assisted Therapy for Addiction: Results from a Preliminary Observational Study in Canada Rural aboriginal population 2013 Observational study
Impaired cognitive performance in drug free users of recreational ecstasy (MDMA) Otherwise healthy young people 2000 Observational
Continued cannabis use and risk of incidence and persistence of psychotic symptoms: 10 year follow-up cohort study Individuals from the general population in Germany aged 14-24 at baseline 2011 Observational cohort n = 1,923
Cannabis-induced psychosis and subsequent schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: follow-up study of 535 incident cases Patients treated for cannabis-induced psychotic symptoms in Denmark between 1994 and... 2005 Observational cohort n = 535

Citations in the library

Explore topics