Skip to content

A Content Analysis of Dion McGregor’s Sleep-Talking Episodes

Deirdre Barrett, Malcolm Grayson, OH Angela, Zach Sogolow

Imagination Cognition and Personality March 26, 2015 DOI: 10.1177/0276236615574495 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Comparative content analysis Peer reviewed
Population Somniloquies of Dion McGregor compared with normative male dreams
Measures Hall and van de Castle Content Scales, Hobson Bizarreness Scales
Citations 1
Key points McGregor's somniloquies differed from normative male dreams on several Hall and van de Castle scales: more female and familiar characters but fewer family members, more befriending and aggressor roles but less physical aggression, less aggression, friendliness, and sex overall, and more self-negativity. On the Hobson Bizarreness Scales, three of six scales showed no difference, with slightly fewer plot incongruities and many fewer thought incongruities or uncertainties. The authors attribute these patterns to presumed greater frontal activation and McGregor's personal idiosyncrasies.

Abstract

This article explores the content of the somniloquies of Dion McGregor, the most extensive sleep talker ever recorded, and compares these with dream content from normative male dreams on the Hall and van de Castle Content Scales and Hobson Bizarreness Scales. On the Hall and van de Castle Scales, the somniloquies contained significantly more female characters relative to males than for the norms, more familiar characters and friends, but fewer family members. The dreamer-as-character was much likelier to be either a befriender or an aggressor than in the normative dreams but much less likely to engage in physical aggression specifically. There was less aggression, friendliness, or sex per character in McGregor’s narratives, as well as less of all three of these types of interaction total than for the norms, but much more self-negativity. There were a lower percentage of negative emotions, good fortune, and success, but the somniloquies were similar to the norms in their levels of misfortune and failure. On the Hobson Bizarreness Scales, the McGregor somniloquies were not differentiated from dreams on three of six scales—having similar levels of discontinuity of plot, characters, objects, and actions but had slightly fewer incongruities of plot, and many fewer instances of incongruity or uncertainly of thought. These findings are discussed in terms of presumed brain activation differences—more frontal activation—and also in terms of McGregor’s personal idiosyncrasies.

Citations in the library

Explore topics