Skip to content

Decoding attentional states for neurofeedback: Mindfulness vs. wandering thoughts.

A Zhigalov, E Heinilä, T Parviainen, L Parkkonen, A Hyvärinen

Neuroimage January 15, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.014 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Machine-learning classification study using MEG recordings Peer reviewed
Population Human subjects performing mindfulness meditation and thought-inducing tasks (number not stated)
Interventions Mindfulness meditation Thought-inducing tasks
Measures Classification accuracy
Topics Meditation
Keywords Machine learning Magnetoencephalography Neurofeedback
Key points Spectral- and connectivity-based classifiers discriminated mindfulness from thought-inducing tasks with about 60% accuracy versus 50% chance when tested on a separate session within the same subject. The two approaches performed similarly, with connectivity slightly better in a few cases. Classification coefficients and associated independent components were highly individual, and transferring coefficients across subjects yielded near-chance accuracy.

Abstract

Neurofeedback requires a direct translation of neuronal brain activity to sensory input given to the user or subject. However, decoding certain states, e.g., mindfulness or wandering thoughts, from ongoing brain activity remains an unresolved problem. In this study, we used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to acquire brain activity during mindfulness meditation and thought-inducing tasks mimicking wandering thoughts. We used a novel real-time feature extraction to decode the mindfulness, i.e., to discriminate it from the thought-inducing tasks. The key methodological novelty of our approach is usage of MEG power spectra and functional connectivity of independent components as features underlying mindfulness states. Performance was measured as the classification accuracy on a separate session but within the same subject. We found that the spectral- and connectivity-based classification approaches allowed discriminating mindfulness and thought-inducing tasks with an accuracy around 60% compared to the 50% chance-level. Both classification approaches showed similar accuracy, although the connectivity approach slightly outperformed the spectral one in a few cases. Detailed analysis showed that the classification coefficients and the associated independent components were highly individual among subjects and a straightforward transfer of the coefficients over subjects provided near chance-level classification accuracy. Thus, discriminating between mindfulness and wandering thoughts seems to be possible, although with limited accuracy, by machine learning, especially on the subject-level. Our hope is that the developed spectral- and connectivity-based decoding methods can be utilized in real-time neurofeedback to decode mindfulness states from ongoing neuronal activity, and hence, provide a basis for improved, individualized mindfulness training.

Citations in the library

Cited by 10

and 5 more in the library

Cites 5

Explore topics