Skip to content

Polysomnographic Sleep in Idiopathic Nightmares: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jiaxue Huang, Meiou Wang, Wenxin Bao, Wenqi Lü, Yongming Wang, Shuyao Wu, Xiangdong Tang, Rong Ren, Ye Zhang

Nature and Science of Sleep September 1, 2026 DOI: 10.2147/nss.s602539 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Peer reviewed
Sample size 224
Population Individuals with nightmares and healthy controls
Topics Dreaming
Key findings Meta-analysis of seven case-control studies (112 individuals with nightmares and 112 controls) found no significant differences in sleep macro-architecture, including total sleep time, wake after sleep onset, and sleep stage percentages. The authors conclude that micro-architecture measures such as cyclic alternating pattern and power spectral analysis warrant investigation, but caution that limited data prevent confident conclusions.

Abstract

Objectives: This study conducted a systematic evaluation of polysomnographic differences between individuals with nightmares and healthy controls.

Methods: Electronic searches of All EBM databases, EMBASE, Web of Science, and MEDLINE identified 14 eligible case-control studies; seven studies involving 112 individuals with nightmares and 112 controls were included in meta-analysis.

Results: The meta-analysis of sleep macro-architecture (such as total sleep time, wake after sleep onset, and sleep stage percentages) revealed no significant differences between individuals with nightmares and healthy controls. Furthermore, the limited available data regarding sleep micro-architecture (cyclic alternating patterns (CAP) and power spectral analysis (PSA)) and autonomic measures (heart rate and heart rate variability) in studies not subjected to meta-analysis makes it difficult to draw confident conclusions.

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in sleep macro-architecture. This finding highlights the importance of investigating sleep micro-architecture (such as CAP and PSA), which may be relevant to the physiology of nightmares. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and validated in future studies because of the limited available data.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Dreaming as mind wandering: evidence from functional neuroimaging and first-person content reports. 2013 Systematic review with meta-analytic comparison
Lucid dreaming incidence: A quality effects meta-analysis of 50 years of research 2016 Meta-analysis
The effectiveness of lucid dreaming therapy in patients with nightmares: A systematic review. Adults with chronic and recurring nightmares 2023 Systematic review
The relationships between insomnia, nightmares, and dreams: A systematic review Individuals without a concomitant psychopathology, including those with insomnia or... 2024 Systematic review
Psychosocial treatments for nightmares in adults and children: a systematic review 2023 Systematic review

Explore topics