Skip to content

The effect of mindfulness and acceptance on perceived post-traumatic growth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jacques St Laurent, Jenny Limond, Anke Karl

European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation June 21, 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejtd.2026.100715 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 1,114
Population Cancer patients participating in nine randomized controlled trials
Intervention Mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions (MABIs)
Measures Posttraumatic Growth Inventory
Topics Meditation
Key findings Mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions showed medium pooled effects on global post-traumatic growth (g = 0.54) and New Possibilities (g = 0.51), small effects on Relating to Others (g = 0.39) and Personal Strength (g = 0.38), and negligible effects on Spiritual Change (g = 0.14) and Appreciation of Life (g = 0.24). The authors caution that confidence is limited by the small number of studies, risk of bias, intervention heterogeneity, and lack of generalisability beyond cancer populations.

Abstract

Perceived post-traumatic growth (PTG) refers to self-reported positive change resulting from the struggle with a traumatic experience. There is evidence that mindfulness- and acceptance- based interventions (MABIs) can increase perceived PTG, but this has yet to be reviewed or assessed using meta-analysis. This study investigated the effectiveness of MABIs at increasing perceived PTG across the five domains of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Systematic searches of bibliographic databases and the grey literature (2026, January 18) led to the selection of nine randomised controlled trials (total n = 1114), all conducted with cancer patients. Risk of bias was “high” for three studies and presented “some concerns” for six studies. Meta-analyses (total n = 976), performed using a random-effects model to pool individual study effect sizes (Hedges’ g ), found medium effects on Global PTG ( g = 0.54, 95% CI [0.24 to 0.83]) and New Possibilities ( g = 0.51, 95% CI [0.27 to 0.75]), small effects on Relating to Others ( g = 0.39, 95% CI [0.19, 0.59]) and Personal Strength ( g = 0.38, 95% CI [0.17 to 0.6]), and negligible effects on Spiritual Change ( g = 0.14, 95% CI [0.03 to 0.27]) and Appreciation of Life ( g = 0.24, 95% CI [0.035 to 0.44]). These findings suggest possible effects, but confidence was limited by the small number of studies, risk of bias, intervention heterogeneity, and lack of generalisability beyond oncology populations. There is a need for better designed randomised controlled trials among diverse trauma-affected populations to develop a more robust evidence base.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics