Skip to content

Quality of Life in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression Treated with Intranasal Esketamine as Add-On Therapy to an SSRI—A Prospective, Comparative Study in Real-World Clinical Practice

Daniel Szawarnoga, Joanna Fojcik, Michał Kamil Górski, Marek Krzystanek

Pharmaceuticals October 19, 2026 DOI: 10.3390/ph19101644 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Prospective observational comparative cohort study Peer reviewed
Sample size 60
Population Adults with treatment-resistant depression in real-world clinical practice
Intervention SSRI-based treatment without esketamine
Duration Assessments at baseline, weeks 4, 8, and 12, and after 12 months
Measures World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)
Topics Depression Esketamine
Key findings Both groups improved in quality of life and depressive symptom severity, with larger absolute changes in the esketamine add-on group. Differences were seen in WHOQOL-BREF domains and selected SF-36 subscales. The authors state the association should not be interpreted as evidence of an isolated causal effect of esketamine because treatment was not assigned and residual confounding cannot be excluded.

Abstract

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains one of the most clinically challenging forms of depressive disorders. In many patients, reduction in symptom severity does not translate into full functional recovery; therefore, assessment of treatment effectiveness should also include health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare changes in HRQoL in patients with TRD receiving a treatment strategy including intranasal esketamine as add-on therapy to ongoing treatment based on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and in patients treated with SSRI-based therapy without esketamine.

Materials and Methods: A prospective, observational, comparative cohort study was conducted in real-world clinical practice. Sixty adult patients were included: 30 received intranasal esketamine as add-on therapy to ongoing SSRI-based treatment and 30 received SSRI-based treatment without esketamine. The study protocol did not impose a separate SSRI dose-optimization algorithm; drug selection and dose modifications remained at the discretion of the treating physician in accordance with routine clinical practice. Quality of life was assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Depressive symptom severity was assessed using the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Assessments were performed at baseline, weeks 4, 8, and 12, and after 12 months.

Results: Both groups showed improvement in quality of life and reduction in depressive symptom severity, with larger absolute changes in the group receiving esketamine. Differences involved WHOQOL-BREF domains and selected standard SF-36 subscales.

Conclusions: In this observational cohort, the treatment strategy including intranasal esketamine was associated with greater improvement in several HRQoL measures than SSRI-based treatment without esketamine. Because treatment exposure was not assigned by the investigators and residual confounding cannot be excluded, the findings should not be interpreted as evidence of an isolated causal effect of esketamine.

In the evidence

This study is part of the evidence base for 2 syntheses in the library. Here is how each one recorded it.

  • Both groups improved in quality of life and symptom severity, with larger absolute changes in the esketamine add-on group; authors caution the association is not evidence of an isolated causal effect.

    Synthesized

  • Both groups improved in quality of life and symptom severity, with larger absolute changes in the esketamine add-on group; authors caution this is not evidence of an isolated causal effect.

    Synthesized

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on esketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Treating bipolar depression with esketamine: Safety and effectiveness data from a naturalistic multicentric study on esketamine in bipolar versus unipolar treatment‐resistant depression Patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression (B-TRD) and unipolar... 2023 Observational cohort n = 70
Comparative Effectiveness of Intravenous Ketamine and Intranasal Esketamine in Clinical Practice Among Patients With Treatment-Refractory Depression: An Observational Study. Adults with treatment-resistant depression 2023 Observational study n = 62
Predicting outcome with Intranasal Esketamine treatment: A machine-learning, three-month study in Treatment-Resistant Depression (ESK-LEARNING) Treatment-resistant depression patients 2023 Retrospective, multicentric, real-world study n = 149
Esketamine in treatment-resistant depression patients comorbid with substance-use disorder: A viewpoint on its safety and effectiveness in a subsample of patients from the REAL-ESK study Patients with treatment-resistant depression and a substance use disorder 2023 Observational, retrospective, multicentre study n = 26
Rapid infusion of esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: a retrospective chart review Patients with treatment-resistant depression and bipolar depression meeting DSM-IV-TR... 2017 Retrospective observational study n = 27

Citations in the library

Explore topics

By condition and practice