Quality of Life in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression Treated with Intranasal Esketamine as Add-On Therapy to an SSRI—A Prospective, Comparative Study in Real-World Clinical Practice
Daniel Szawarnoga, Joanna Fojcik, Michał Kamil Górski, Marek Krzystanek
Pharmaceuticals October 19, 2026 DOI: 10.3390/ph19101644 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Prospective observational comparative cohort study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 60 |
| Population | Adults with treatment-resistant depression in real-world clinical practice |
| Intervention | SSRI-based treatment without esketamine |
| Duration | Assessments at baseline, weeks 4, 8, and 12, and after 12 months |
| Measures | World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) |
| Topics | Depression Esketamine |
| Key findings | Both groups improved in quality of life and depressive symptom severity, with larger absolute changes in the esketamine add-on group. Differences were seen in WHOQOL-BREF domains and selected SF-36 subscales. The authors state the association should not be interpreted as evidence of an isolated causal effect of esketamine because treatment was not assigned and residual confounding cannot be excluded. |
Abstract
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains one of the most clinically challenging forms of depressive disorders. In many patients, reduction in symptom severity does not translate into full functional recovery; therefore, assessment of treatment effectiveness should also include health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Objective: The aim of the study was to compare changes in HRQoL in patients with TRD receiving a treatment strategy including intranasal esketamine as add-on therapy to ongoing treatment based on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and in patients treated with SSRI-based therapy without esketamine.
Materials and Methods: A prospective, observational, comparative cohort study was conducted in real-world clinical practice. Sixty adult patients were included: 30 received intranasal esketamine as add-on therapy to ongoing SSRI-based treatment and 30 received SSRI-based treatment without esketamine. The study protocol did not impose a separate SSRI dose-optimization algorithm; drug selection and dose modifications remained at the discretion of the treating physician in accordance with routine clinical practice. Quality of life was assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Depressive symptom severity was assessed using the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Assessments were performed at baseline, weeks 4, 8, and 12, and after 12 months.
Results: Both groups showed improvement in quality of life and reduction in depressive symptom severity, with larger absolute changes in the group receiving esketamine. Differences involved WHOQOL-BREF domains and selected standard SF-36 subscales.
Conclusions: In this observational cohort, the treatment strategy including intranasal esketamine was associated with greater improvement in several HRQoL measures than SSRI-based treatment without esketamine. Because treatment exposure was not assigned by the investigators and residual confounding cannot be excluded, the findings should not be interpreted as evidence of an isolated causal effect of esketamine.
In the evidence
This study is part of the evidence base for 2 syntheses in the library. Here is how each one recorded it.
-
Both groups improved in quality of life and symptom severity, with larger absolute changes in the esketamine add-on group; authors caution the association is not evidence of an isolated causal effect.
Synthesized
-
Both groups improved in quality of life and symptom severity, with larger absolute changes in the esketamine add-on group; authors caution this is not evidence of an isolated causal effect.
Synthesized
Comparable studies
Other observational and cohort studies on esketamine for depression, most cited first.
Citations in the library
Cites 11
- Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study American Journal of Psychiatry May 21, 2019
- Efficacy of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant Treatment for Relapse Prevention in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression JAMA Psychiatry June 5, 2019
- Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine Adjunctive to Oral Antidepressant Therapy in Treatment-Resistant Depression JAMA Psychiatry December 27, 2017
- Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a New Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study (TRANSFORM-1) The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology July 9, 2019
- Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry April 20, 2020
and 6 more in the library