Skip to content

Viśvarūpa and Vānara: Revelation and demonstration

Authors Names Swapan Samanta

International Journal of Sanskrit Research September 1, 2026 DOI: 10.22271/23947519.2026.v12.i5c.3355 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that the Viśvarūpa and the Hanumān portrait in the Sundarakāṇḍa are best understood as independently arising, functionally complementary responses to a shared pedagogical problem: making a mode of consciousness that exceeds ordinary egoic cognition intelligible to a hearer who has not experienced it. Proposes "epistemological function" as a reusable comparative category, while bracketing questions of authorial intention, inter-textual dependence, and etymological claims about the name Hanumān.

Abstract

This paper proposes “epistemological function” as a comparative category for reading Sanskrit epic narrative and applies it to two well-known episodes: the Viśvarūpa of Bhagavad Gītā, Chapter XI, and the sustained portrait of Hanumān in the Sundarakāṇḍa of the Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa. Both, in different ways, address a single pedagogical difficulty: how a mode of consciousness that exceeds ordinary egoic cognition becomes intelligible to a hearer who has not experienced it directly. Read comparatively, and not as a claim about shared authorship or historical dependence between the two epics, the Viśvarūpa performs what this paper calls cognitive boundary-expansion: a single, overwhelming perceptual event that enlarges what a conditioned mind can regard as possible, without itself supplying a durable model for everyday conduct. Hanumān, across the major movements of the Sundarakāṇḍa, performs practical-motivational demonstration: a sustained, narratively observable portrait of intelligence operating with minimal self-referential appropriation, across search, encounter, decisive action, and report. The two, this paper argues, are best understood as independently arising and functionally complementary responses to a shared communicative problem, examined through close reading of the Sanskrit text (Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute critical edition of the Gītā; Baroda Oriental Institute critical edition of the Rāmāyaṇa). Its contribution is methodological as much as interpretive: it offers “epistemological function” as a reusable comparative tool, while bracketing questions of authorial intention, inter-textual dependence, and etymological claims about the name Hanumān that lie outside its evidentiary scope.

Explore topics