Living well: Empirically developed structural equation model for healthy and effective self-regulation.
Benedict Heblich, Orestis Terzidis, Marcos González M, Katherina Kuschel, Mouzzam Mukadam, Marius Birkenbach
International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP March 5, 2023 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100375 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Cross-sectional structural equation modeling study Longitudinal Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 6,705 |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Psychological well-being Subjective well-being Personal values Self-determination theory Psychological needs satisfaction |
| Key findings | The tested self-determination theory model of self-regulation fit the data well, and local fit indices suggest that autonomy of goals, intrinsic values orientation, mindfulness, and clarity about personal values positively affect psychological needs satisfaction and facets of subjective and psychological well-being. Mindfulness and clarity about personal values are indicated to have the greatest benefits for health, well-being, and effectiveness. |
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop and empirically test a structural equation model (SEM) for healthy and effective self-regulation based on the propositions of self-determination theory (SDT). A cross-sectional data sample (N = 6,705) is used to test the model. The results of the SEM demonstrate good to excellent global fit indices (RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.04 CFI = 0.97, TLI/NNFI = 0.95) and excellent local fit indices (p < 0.001). It is acknowledged that longitudinal and experimental research designs will be necessary to infer causal effects. However, based on the strong theoretical and empirical grounding of the model, indications for causal effects are discussed beyond correlational relations. The local fit indices imply that autonomy of goals, intrinsic values orientation, mindfulness, and the newly integrated construct clarity about personal values positively affect psychological needs satisfaction and facets of subjective and psychological well-being. Additionally, they indicate that mindfulness and clarity about personal values have the greatest benefits on individual health, well-being, and effectiveness. These results are crucial as they emphasize the significant role of mindfulness in healthy and effective self-regulation. Furthermore, they put the spotlight on a rather new construct; clarity about personal values. By having transferred the knowledge base of SDT into an empirically derived model of healthy and effective self-regulation, this study provides well-grounded indications of how health, well-being, and effectiveness in individuals may be fostered. These indications offer new insights for theory building and practical interventions in domains like psychotherapy, healthcare, organizations, sports, and education.
Comparable studies
Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups | 2008 | Cross-sectional study | |
| Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants | 2007 | Observational cross-sectional | n = 27 |
| Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents | 2011 | Cross-sectional validation study | n = 1,413 |
| Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators | 2012 | Cross-sectional study | n = 152 |
| Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates | 2008 | Cross-sectional, correlational |