Genuine Triadicity in Computation, Cognition and Consciousness
David Lidov
Chinese Semiotic Studies May 1, 2019 DOI: 10.1515/css-2019-0012 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that a distinct theory of data (cybernetics) is adequate to describe the role of information in primitive lifeforms, and that current developments in computation and animal behavior do not demonstrate that triadic relations are inherent in their operations. The author adopts definitions that do not support the proposal, associated with Thomas Sebeok, that life and semiosis are coextensive. |
Abstract
Abstract Charles Peirce insisted that representation is a genuine three-part relation, irreducible to a complex of two-part relations. Demonstrations that two-part relations (like stimulus and response) can be described as three-part are chaff in the wind. Ironically, Peirce’s well-known description in semiotic language of sunflowers makes that error. Until recently, there was scant reason to speak of “sign” – in its full Peircean sense – in biology, computation, or even for unconscious thought. Current developments in computation and animal behavior suggest that triadic relations could be inherent in some classes of their operations, but this article does not find that possibility demonstrated. Instead, the argument is advanced that we should recognize a distinct theory of data (cybernetics) as adequate to describe the role of information in primitive lifeforms. Thus, we adopt definitions that do not support the proposal associated with (though not originating with) Thomas Sebeok, that life and semiosis are coextensive.