Skip to content

An adapted Delphi approach: The use of an expert panel to operationally define non-judgment of internal experiences as it relates to mindfulness.

Morganne A. Kraines, Lisa A Uebelacker, Brandon A Gaudiano, Richard N Jones, Courtney Beard, Eric B Loucks, Judson A. Brewer

Complementary Therapies in Medicine May 17, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102444 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Delphi survey (adapted, three rounds) Peer reviewed
Sample size 18
Population Mindfulness researchers or clinicians serving as expert review panelists
Duration Three survey rounds
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Judgment Delphi technique
Key findings The expert panel reached consensus on an operational definition of non-judgment of internal experiences: 'acknowledging our thoughts, feelings, and sensations, as they are, without applying valence (e.g., good, bad, right, wrong) to them.' The authors state this is the first systematic definition of non-judgment in the mindfulness literature and propose it as a foundation for an implicit measure of the construct.

Abstract

Objectives: There are several definitions of mindfulness throughout the literature, many of which suggest an attitude of non-judgmental awareness. However, the concept of "non-judgment" itself has not previously been systematically operationally defined. Our purpose was to use an expert panel to generate an operational definition of non-judgment of internal experiences, as it relates to mindfulness, to be used to inform the development of an implicit measure of the construct.

Design: We utilized an adapted Delphi survey method consisting of three survey rounds.

Setting: We employed in-person and online survey methods.

Results: We used three survey rounds with an adapted Delphi approach. Expert review panelists consisted of 18 mindfulness researchers or clinicians. Each round of survey results was assessed and discussed among the core team. A consensus was reached among the core team for an operational definition of non-judgment of internal experiences: "acknowledging our thoughts, feelings, and sensations, as they are, without applying valence (e.g., good, bad, right, wrong) to them."

Conclusions: An expert panel review process informed the generation of an operational definition of non-judgment of internal experiences. Our operational definition provides a foundation for the future development of an implicit task of non-judgment of internal experiences, with the aim of using this task to assess change in response to mindfulness-based treatments. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic definition of non-judgment of internal experiences within the mindfulness literature.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics