Skip to content

Rates of attrition and engagement in randomized controlled trials of mindfulness apps: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jake Linardon

Behaviour Research and Therapy October 14, 2023 DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104421 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized Qualitative Peer reviewed
Sample size 9,258
Population Participants allocated to mindfulness app conditions across 70 randomized controlled trials, including general adult populations and other target samples
Intervention Mindfulness apps
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Mental health Adult Mobile applications Meta-analysis Randomized controlled trials Systematic review Attrition Digital health
Key findings The weighted meta-analytic attrition rate from mindfulness apps was 24.7% across 9,258 participants, and 38.7% when restricted to larger studies (n ≥ 100 per condition) and certain target samples. Attrition was higher than in waitlist conditions but not different from placebo or active apps. Monetary compensation and in-person enrollment were associated with lower attrition, and engagement data were inadequately reported despite qualitative evidence of problems with sustained engagement.

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) have established the efficacy of mindfulness apps for numerous mental health and behavioral outcomes. However, studies of this kind are characterized by significant problems with attrition and engagement, making it challenging to interpret these findings and realize the full potential of mindfulness app-based solutions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine rates of attrition from, and engagement in, mindfulness apps in 70 RCTs located through four databases. The weighted meta-analytic attrition rate from 9258 participants allocated to a mindfulness app was 24.7%. This estimate was higher (38.7%) when restricting analyses to larger studies (n ≥ 100 per condition) and for specific target samples (e.g., general population of adults). Studies that offered participants monetary compensation and required in-person enrolment methods were associated with the lowest attrition rates. Attrition was higher in mindfulness app conditions relative to waitlists, but was not different to placebo or active apps. Although engagement data were inadequately reported, qualitative synthesis highlighted clear problems with sustained user engagement with mindfulness apps. Findings have implications for powering, designing and appraising research trials of mindfulness apps, as well as the development of potentially effective retention and engagement strategies worthy of evaluation in future work.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 22

and 17 more in the library

Cites 19

and 14 more in the library

Explore topics