Depersonalization: Deconstructing Eliot’s Notion in The Waste Land
Alanoud Abdulaziz Alghanem
International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation June 30, 2020 DOI: 10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.6.23 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that a psychoanalytic, subjective re-reading of The Waste Land reveals personal tones and an authorial presence that Eliot's 'impersonal theory' and New Critical reading protocols marginalize. Concludes that the poem deviates from Eliot's theory of 'Depersonalization.' |
Abstract
Through a re-reading and a reassessment of Thomas Stearns Eliot’s (1888–1965) masterpiece The Waste Land (1922), the present paper aims at recycling the poem with new polysemy. By using specific methods of the psychoanalytic approach, this study demonstrates that many details about the text and its context are marginalized if read through the objective protocols of Eliot/the New Critics. Thus, the present paper is devoted to re-reading the text subjectively to deconstruct Eliot's “impersonal theory” in catering efficiently for the author’s presence. The conclusion will prove that the text is highly charged with personal tones, and consequently deviates from his theory of “Depersonalization,” thereby proving an authorial presence.