Skip to content

Associations between mindfulness and implicit cognition and self-reported affect.

Andrew J. Waters, Lorraine R Reitzel, Paul M Cinciripini, Yisheng Li, Marianne T. Marcus, Jennifer Irvin Vidrine, David W. Wetter

Substance Abuse 2009 DOI: 10.1080/08897070903252080 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional study Peer reviewed
Sample size 158
Population Smokers attempting to quit
Measures modified Stroop tasks, Implicit Association Tests (IATs), self-report assessments
Topics Meditation
Key findings Among 158 smokers, higher mindfulness was associated with lower negative affect, perceived stress, and depressive symptom severity, and with greater positive affect. Mindfulness was not associated with disengaging attention from smoking or affective stimuli. On the depression Implicit Association Test, more mindful participants showed a more negative IAT effect, which the authors suggest may indicate a detached perspective to depression-related stimuli.

Abstract

Theory suggests that mindful individuals exhibit enhanced attentional processing (e.g., attentional control) and that they maintain a detached perspective to problematic stimuli. For smokers, smoking and affective stimuli are problematic stimuli when they try to quit. In this cross-sectional study, smokers (n = 158) completed 3 modified Stroop tasks (to assess attentional control), 3 Implicit Association Tests (IATs; to assess detached perspective), and a battery of self-report assessments. Degree of mindfulness was negatively associated (P < .05) with self-reported negative affect, perceived stress, and depressive symptom severity, and positively associated (P < .05) with positive affect. Degree of mindfulness was not associated with the ability to disengage attention from smoking or affective stimuli. On the depression IAT, more mindful participants exhibited a more negative IAT effect, suggesting that they may have developed a detached perspective to depression-related stimuli. Theoretical and clinical implications of the data are discussed.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics