“Identity”
Current Anthropology August 1, 2011 DOI: 10.1086/660999 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 49 |
| Key points | Argues that the post-1990 rise of ethnoreligious identity politics in Nepal reflects a global "identity machine" that establishes both the categories of identity claimed in democratic states and their ontological foundations in liberal conceptions of self and citizenship. Modernist Buddhists who claim religious rights while practicing vipassana meditation, which challenges the idea of identity, both participate in and rework neoliberal modernity—a paradox the author says anthropologists should study rather than naturalize. |
Abstract
“Identity” is a key term for anthropological analysis today. This paper explores the challenge posed by modernist Buddhists in Nepal who participated in identity politics while grounding their claims to identity-based rights in belonging to a religious community defined by the doctrine that there is no such thing as a “self” in the conventional sense. Examining the sharp proliferation of identity-based discourses and claims in post-1990 Nepal in light of broader structural transformations associated with the globalization of neoliberal governance strategies and against the rise of a popular vipassana meditation movement, I suggest that the rise of ethnoreligious politics in Nepal at that time reflects the presence of a global “identity machine”—an apparatus that establishes not only the categories of identity recognized and claimed in democratic states but also, indeed, their very ontological foundations in liberal conceptions of self, citizenship, and social relations. Nepali Buddhists who claim religious rights while also engaging in practices that challenge the very idea of identity are at once participating in the ideological and institutional conditions of neoliberal modernity and also reworking these in unexpected ways. This paradox calls on anthropologists to study the processes that produce and extend particular ways of seeing and organizing the world rather than inadvertently naturalizing them.