Post-action determinants of the reported time of conscious intentions.
Davide Rigoni, Marcel Brass, Giuseppe Sartori
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2010 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00038 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Event-related potential (ERP) experiment Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Measures | will judgment (W), action-effect negativity (N(AE)) |
| Keywords | Action-effect negativity Action-monitoring Conscious decisions Free will Intentions |
| Key findings | The authors report that delayed auditory feedback after a button press evoked an action-effect negativity (N(AE)) at 250-300 ms whose amplitude increased with longer feedback delays, and that changes in N(AE) were associated with changes in the reported time of the decision to act. They argue this indicates the subjective timing of conscious intention is influenced by an action-monitoring system that detects mismatches between predicted and actual sensory consequences. |
Abstract
The question of whether our behavior is guided by our conscious intentions is gaining momentum within the field of cognitive neuroscience. It has been demonstrated that the subjective experience that conscious intentions are the driving force of our actions, is built partially on a post hoc reconstruction. Our hypothesis was that this reconstructive process is mediated by an action-monitoring system that compares the predicted and the actual sensory consequences of an action. We applied event-related potentials (ERP) to a variant of the Libet's task in which participants were asked to press a button and to report the time of decision - will judgment (W) - to press. We provided delayed auditory feedbacks after participants' action to signify an action time later than the actual action. We found that auditory feedbacks evoked a negative component in the 250-300 time range, namely action-effect negativity (N(AE)), that is thought to reflect the activity of a system that detects violation from expectancies. We showed that the amplitude of the N(AE) was sensitive to the delay of the auditory feedback, with a larger amplitude for more delayed feedbacks. Furthermore, changes in the N(AE) were also associated with changes in the reported W. These results not only confirm that we infer the time we decided to act from events occurring after the response, but these results also indicate that the subjective experience of when an action is decided is influenced by the activity of an action-monitoring system that detects mismatches between predicted and actual sensory consequences of the actions.
Citations in the library
Cited by 4
- Libet's Legacy: A Primer to the Neuroscience of Volition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews December 1, 2023
- What is the intention to move and when does it occur? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews August 2023
- The neural basis of event-time introspection. Consciousness and Cognition December 2011
- Inducing disbelief in free will alters brain correlates of preconscious motor preparation: the brain minds whether we believe in free will or not. Psychological Science May 2011