Skip to content

Event-related electroencephalographic correlations between isolated human subjects.

Dean Radin

The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine April 1, 2004 DOI: 10.1089/107555304323062301 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cross-over style paired EEG experiment with equipment-only control runs Peer reviewed
Sample size 26
Population 13 pairs of volunteers: 11 pairs of adult friends and 2 mother-daughter pairs
Keywords Brain Humans Electrocardiography Electroencephalography Cross-over studies Photic stimulation Consciousness Intuition Pattern recognition, visual Arousal Reaction time Galvanic skin response Evoked potentials, visual Heart rate Time factors Adolescent Adult Middle aged Child Female
Key findings EEG ensemble variance in a sensorially isolated person was correlated with event-related potentials in a distant person's EEG (r = 0.20, p = 0.0005), whereas control runs without humans present showed no correlation (r = -0.03, p = 0.61). Three of 13 pairs showed independently significant correlations, and stronger stimulated-person responses accompanied larger nonstimulated-person responses (p = 0.0008). The authors suggest this indicates an unknown form of energetic or informational interaction.

Abstract

Objective: To examine electroencephalograms (EEG) in pairs of people to see if event-related potentials evoked in one person's brain are correlated with concurrent responses in the brain of a distant, isolated person.

Design: Simultaneously record EEGs using independent physiologic monitoring systems. One person relaxes in a double steel-walled, electromagnetically and acoustically shielded room while a second, located in a dimly lit room 20 meters away, is stimulated at random times by the live video image of the first person. Subjects: Thirteen (13) pairs of volunteers. Eleven (11) pairs of adult friends and 2 mother-daughter pairs. Outcome measures: Epochs of interest were the moments of stimulus onset and offset, +/- 5 seconds, in both participants' EEGs. A positive correlation was postulated to appear between the ensemble variance of the stimulated subjects' EEGs versus an identical measure in the nonstimulated subjects. Control data using the same equipment and test conditions, but without humans present, was collected to check for equipment and analytical artifacts. Nonparametric bootstrap methods were used to assess statistical significance of the observed correlations.

Results: The control test resulted in a correlation of r =-0.03, p = 0.61; the experimental test resulted in r = 0.20, p = 0.0005. Three (3) of the 13 pairs of participants showed independently significant correlations. Examination of the stimulated subjects' event-related potentials showed that the stronger their responses, the larger the corresponding responses in the nonstimulated subjects (p = 0.0008).

Conclusion: Under certain conditions, the EEG of a sensorially isolated human subject can become correlated with event-related potentials in a distant person's EEG. This suggests the presence of an unknown form of energetic or informational interaction.

Citations in the library