Skip to content

The role of feedback in visual masking and visual processing.

Stephen L Macknik, Susana Martinez-Conde

Advances in Cognitive Psychology July 15, 2008 DOI: 10.2478/v10053-008-0020-5 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Keywords Attention Awareness Consciousness Electrophysiology FMRI Feedback Humans Masking Metacontrast Monkeys Optical imaging Paracontrast Psychophysics Standing wave Vision Visual
Key findings Argues that constraints on feedback mechanisms limit their role in visual masking and general brain function, and proposes a feedforward model of visual masking. Suggests the high ratio of feedback to feedforward visual connections may be explained by the need for top-down attentional modulation. Proposes new neurophysiological standards for identifying the neural substrate of awareness.

Abstract

This paper reviews the potential role of feedback in visual masking, for and against. Our analysis reveals constraints for feedback mecha- nisms that limit their potential role in visual masking, and in all other general brain functions. We propose a feedforward model of visual masking, and provide a hypothesis to explain the role of feedback in visual masking and visual processing in general. We review the anato-my and physiology of feedback mechanisms, and propose that the massive ratio of feedback versus feedforward connections in the visual system may be explained solely by the critical need for top-down attentional modulation. We discuss the merits of visual masking as a tool to discover the neural correlates of consciousness, especially as compared to other popular illusions, such as binocular rivalry. Finally, we propose a new set of neurophysiological standards needed to establish whether any given neuron or brain circuit may be the neural substrate of awareness.

Citations in the library