Skip to content

An overview of systematic reviews on cannabis and psychosis: Discussing apparently conflicting results

Silvia Minozzi, Marina Davoli, Anna Maria Bargagli, Laura Amato, Simona Vecchi, Carlo Alberto Perucci

Drug and Alcohol Review May 1, 2010 DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00132.x (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review of systematic reviews (overview) Cross-sectional Peer reviewed
Topics Cannabis
Citations 80
Key findings Four of five systematic reviews that meta-analysed the data showed a consistent association between cannabis use and psychosis, while one broader review without meta-analysis found an inconsistent association. The authors conclude that a causal relationship cannot be firmly established because reverse causality and residual confounding cannot be excluded, and that knowledge is insufficient to determine the level of risk.

Abstract

ISSUES: Cross-sectional surveys have revealed that cannabis is the most widely used illicit substance in Western countries. Cannabis intoxication can lead to acute, transient psychotic symptoms and the short-term exacerbation of pre-existing psychotic symptoms. However, controversy exists about whether cannabis can actually cause long-term psychosis. APPROACH: We summarised the findings of systematic reviews on the association between cannabis use and psychosis, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL up to August 2007. We assessed the methodological quality, selected the better quality reviews and analysed reasons for discordant results. KEY

Findings: We included five systematic reviews. Four of the reviews performed a meta-analysis and showed a consistent association between cannabis use and psychosis; the fifth review considered psychological problems more broadly, did not perform a meta-analysis and reported an inconsistent association. The reasons for discordance were: different outcomes (psychosis vs. psychological problems), different inclusion criteria for primary studies and different methods for summarising the results.

Implications: This overview shows a consistent association between cannabis use and psychotic symptoms, though it is not possible to draw firm conclusions about a causal relationship. Reverse causality and residual confounding cannot be excluded. An interaction with other environmental and genetic factors is difficult to ascertain.

Conclusion: We conclude that there is insufficient knowledge to determine the level of risk associated with cannabis use in relation to psychotic symptoms and that more information is needed on both the risks of cannabis use and the benefits of preventive interventions to support evidence-based approaches in this area.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cannabis, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Effects of cannabis use on outcomes of psychotic disorders: systematic review People with psychotic disorders, as examined in 13 longitudinal studies 2008 Systematic review
The Impact of Cannabis Use on Cognitive Functioning in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Existing Findings and New Data in a First-Episode Sample Patients with established schizophrenia (meta-analysis: 572) and patients with... 2010 Meta-analysis and cross-sectional observational study n = 700
Medicinal cannabis for psychiatric disorders: a clinically-focused systematic review 2020 Systematic review
Neuroimaging in cannabis use: a systematic review of the literature Cannabis users and controls in neuroimaging studies 2009 Systematic review
Human Laboratory Studies on Cannabinoids and Psychosis. Healthy human subjects and individuals with schizophrenia 2016 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics