Skip to content

Further characterization of the stimulus properties of 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-1,3-dioxolo[4,5-g]isoquinoline.

Richard A Glennon, Richard Young, Jagadeesh B Rangisetty

Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior May 2002 DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(01)00768-7 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Preclinical animal study Peer reviewed
Population Rats
Interventions TDIQ DOM (+)amphetamine MDMA PMMA TDIQ analogs
Dose DOM 1.0 mg/kg, (+)amphetamine 1.0 mg/kg, MDMA 1.5 mg/kg, TDIQ 5.0 mg/kg
Measures drug discrimination, radioligand binding
Key points TDIQ produces discriminative stimulus effects in rats that do not generalize to amphetamine, DOM, MDMA, or PMMA. Several TDIQ analogs substituted for TDIQ but not for the other phenylalkylamines, and N-methylation abolished TDIQ-like stimulus action. Preliminary binding studies suggest an alpha2-adrenergic mechanism may underlie TDIQ's stimulus effects.

Abstract

This investigation is based on the premise that conformational restriction of abused phenylalkylamines in a tetrahydroisoquinoline conformation alters their pharmacology in such a manner that their original action is lost and that a new action emerges. TDIQ or 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-1,3-dioxolo[4,5-g]isoquinoline, is a conformationally constrained phenylalkylamine that serves as a discriminative stimulus in animals. Although TDIQ bears structural resemblance to phenylalkylamine stimulants (e.g., amphetamine), hallucinogens (e.g., 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane [DOM]), and designer drugs (e.g., N-methyl-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane [MDMA], N-methyl-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane [PMMA]), the TDIQ stimulus failed to generalize to (+)amphetamine or MDMA. In the present investigation, further evaluations were made of the stimulus nature of TDIQ. Specifically, the stimulus similarities of TDIQ, PMMA, and DOM were examined. In no case was stimulus generalization (substitution) observed. The results confirm that TDIQ produces stimulus effects distinct from those of the abovementioned phenylalkylamines. We also examined the structure-activity relationships of a series of TDIQ analogs, including several that might be viewed as conformationally restricted (CR) analogs of phenylalkylamine hallucinogens, stimulants, and designer drugs. These agents were examined in rats trained to discriminate either DOM (1.0 mg/kg), (+)amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg), MDMA (1.5 mg/kg), or TDIQ (5.0 mg/kg) from saline vehicle. Whereas we have demonstrated that none of these agents retains their respective phenylalkylamine stimulus actions, several of these agents were found to substitute for TDIQ. N-Methylation abolished TDIQ-stimulus action. These results, coupled with previous findings, imply that TDIQ derivatives represent a novel class of phenylalkylamines analogs with unique stimulus properties. Preliminary radioligand binding studies suggest that an alpha2-adrenergic mechanism might underlie the stimulus effects produced by TDIQ.

Citations in the library

Explore topics