Skip to content

Disrupted 'reflection' impulsivity in cannabis users but not current or former ecstasy users.

L Clark, Jonathan P. Roiser, Trevor W Robbins, Barbara J. Sahakian

Journal of Psychopharmacology May 30, 2008 DOI: 10.1177/0269881108089587 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cross-sectional study Peer reviewed
Sample size 94
Population Current ecstasy users, past ecstasy users, current cannabis users, and drug-naive controls
Measures Information Sampling Test, Impulsivity subscale of the Eysenck Impulsiveness-Venturesomeness-Empathy questionnaire
Topics Serotonin Cannabis MDMA
Keywords Humans Neurotoxicity syndromes Substance-related disorders Marijuana abuse Tobacco use disorder N-methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine Hallucinogens Self disclosure Demography Adult Female Surveys and questionnaires
Key findings Current and past ecstasy users did not differ significantly from drug-naive controls on the Information Sampling Test, despite elevated self-reported impulsivity. Cannabis users sampled significantly less information and tolerated lower certainty in decision-making than controls, suggesting reduced reflection may be a common cognitive style across regular users of various substances. The authors argue the lack of effects in ecstasy users indicates the relationship between serotonin function, ecstasy use, and impulsivity is more complex.

Abstract

Evidence for serotonin involvement in impulsivity has generated interest in the measurement of impulsivity in regular ecstasy users, who are thought to display serotonergic dysfunction. However, current findings are inconsistent. Here, we used a recently developed Information Sampling Test to measure 'reflection' impulsivity in 46 current ecstasy users, 14 subjects who used ecstasy in the past, 15 current cannabis users and 19 drug-naïve controls. Despite elevated scores on the Impulsivity subscale of the Eysenck Impulsiveness-Venturesomeness-Empathy questionnaire, the current and previous ecstasy users did not differ significantly from the drug-naive controls on the Information Sampling Test. In contrast, the cannabis users sampled significantly less information on the task, and tolerated a lower level of certainty in their decision-making, in comparison to the drug-naive controls. The effect in cannabis users extends our earlier observations in amphetamine- and opiate-dependent individuals (Clark, et al., 2006, Biological Psychiatry 60: 515-522), and suggests that reduced reflection may be a common cognitive style across regular users of a variety of substances. However, the lack of effects in the two ecstasy groups suggests that the relationship between serotonin function, ecstasy use and impulsivity is more complex.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on cannabis, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Cannabis use before age 15 and subsequent executive functioning 104 chronic cannabis users (49 early-onset before age 15, 55 late-onset after age 15)... 2011 Observational cross-sectional study n = 148
Patterns of simultaneous polysubstance use in drug using university students Drug-using university students 2006 Cross-sectional survey n = 149
Persisting Reductions in Cannabis, Opioid, and Stimulant Misuse After Naturalistic Psychedelic Use: An Online Survey Online survey respondents 2020 Cross-sectional survey
User perceptions of the benefits and harms of hallucinogenic drug use: A web-based questionnaire study Users of hallucinogenic drugs who completed a web-based questionnaire 2010 Cross-sectional survey n = 600
Illicit Use of LSD or Psilocybin, but not MDMA or Nonpsychedelic Drugs, is Associated with Mystical Experiences in a Dose-Dependent Manner Adults recruited from the MAPS website and newsletter, most reporting use of various... 2012 Cross-sectional survey n = 337

Citations in the library

Cited by 10

and 5 more in the library

Cites 8

and 3 more in the library

Explore topics