Skip to content

Effects of Schedule I drug laws on neuroscience research and treatment innovation.

David Nutt, Leslie A. King, David E Nichols

Nature reviews. Neuroscience June 12, 2013 DOI: 10.1038/nrn3530 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Commentary Peer reviewed
Keywords Animals Humans Psychotropic drugs Neurosciences Biomedical research Legislation, drug Illicit drugs
Key points Argues that strict legal controls on cannabis, MDMA, and psychedelics, while prompted by recreational use and perceived dangers, have made research into these drugs' mechanisms of action and potential therapeutic uses, including for depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, difficult and in many cases almost impossible.

Abstract

Many psychoactive drugs are used recreationally, particularly by young people. This use and its perceived dangers have led to many different classes of drugs being banned under national laws and international conventions. Indeed, the possession of cannabis, 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine (MDMA; also known as ecstasy) and psychedelics is stringently regulated. An important and unfortunate outcome of the controls placed on these and other psychoactive drugs is that they make research into their mechanisms of action and potential therapeutic uses - for example, in depression and post-traumatic stress disorder - difficult and in many cases almost impossible.

Citations in the library

Cited by 199

and 194 more in the library

Cites 32

and 27 more in the library

Explore topics