Skip to content

Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction for adults with sleep disturbance: a protocol for an update of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Seong Min Kim, Jeong-Min Park, Hyun-Ju Seo

Systematic Reviews April 2, 2016 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0228-2 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review protocol Randomized Peer reviewed
Intervention Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR)
Measures polysomnography, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Stress, psychological Psychotherapy Research design Adult Meta-analysis as topic Sleep disorders Protocol Systematic review
Key findings The protocol outlines a planned systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize up-to-date evidence on the effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction for people with sleep disturbance or insomnia, using sleep quality measured by polysomnography or self-report questionnaires as the primary outcome. The authors state that no systematic reviews or meta-analyses currently synthesize the most recent research on this question.

Abstract

Background: Sleep disturbance is a common and significant health problem that has been linked to decreased quality of life. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) can be a potentially effective intervention for insomnia. In previous systematic review examining the effects of MBSR for people with sleep disturbance, the authors highlighted the need for additional well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of MBSR practice. Recently, several RCTs of the effectiveness of MBSR for individuals who have difficulties in sleep have been published. Therefore, the aim of this review is to update and synthesize evidence on the effects of MBSR for people with sleep disturbance or insomnia. Methods/design: We will search ovidMEDLINE, ovidEMBASE, Allied and Alternative Medicine, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and four representative Korean electronic databases including KoreaMed, the Korean Studies Information Service System, the Korean Medical Database, and the National Digital Science Library. Two reviewers will independently screen and select relevant studies. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool will be used to assess risk of bias in the included studies. The primary outcomes will be defined as the change in sleep quality before and after the intervention as evaluated by the polysomnography or self-reported questionnaires such as the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. If quantitative synthesis is not appropriate, a descriptive analysis might be undertaken.

Discussion: Many published primary studies have investigated the positive effects of MBSR on sleep quality; however, there are no systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesizing the evidence of up-to-date research on the effects of MBSR for sleep problems. The review findings will aid the general population and healthcare providers in making informed decisions on evidence-based intervention selection for sleep disturbance or insomnia. Systematic review

Registration: PROSPERO CRD42015027963 .

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 6

and 1 more in the library

Cites 8

and 3 more in the library

Explore topics