Skip to content

On the relation between body ownership and sense of agency: A link at the level of sensory-related signals.

Maria Pyasik, Dalila Burin, Lorenzo Pia

Acta Psychologica April 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.03.001 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational study Peer reviewed
Population Healthy participants
Measures proprioceptive shift, questionnaire on the subjective experience of ownership, intentional binding, attenuation of the intensity of auditory outcomes of actions, questionnaire on the subjective experience of authorship
Keywords Body ownership Intentional binding Multisensory integration Rubber hand illusion Sense of agency Sensory attenuation
Key findings Proprioceptive shift in the rubber hand illusion was positively correlated with attenuation of auditory outcomes of actions, an implicit index of agency, while explicit questionnaire measures of ownership and authorship showed no significant correlations. The authors argue that implicit sensory-integration processes are common to both senses, whereas explicit subjective experiences rely on sense-specific processes.

Abstract

The relation between sense of body ownership and sense of agency is still highly debated. Here we investigated in a large sample of healthy participants the associations between several implicit and explicit indexes of the two senses. Specifically, we examined the correlations between proprioceptive shift (implicit measure) and questionnaire on the subjective experience of ownership (explicit measure) within the rubber hand illusion paradigm (body ownership), and intentional binding (implicit measure), attenuation of the intensity of auditory outcomes of actions (implicit measure) and questionnaire on the subjective experience of authorship (explicit measure) within the Libet's clock paradigm (sense of agency). Our results showed that proprioceptive shift was positively correlated with the attenuation of auditory outcomes. No significant correlations were found between the explicit measures of the two senses. We argue that the individual spatiotemporal constraints subserving the integration of sensory-related signals (implicit signature) would be common to both senses, whereas their subjective experience (explicit signature) would rely on additional processes specific for any given sense.

Citations in the library

Explore topics